New Funds on FundMonitors.com

Below are some of the funds we've recently added to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research, platform availability, and news & insights. 

View Profile

View Profile

Want to see more funds?

Subscribe for full access to these funds and over 800 others

Hedge Clippings | 05 April 2024

US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell pushed back expectations for an early (and multiple) cut to interest rates, saying they're still likely, but only at "some point" this year, saying that "solid growth, a strong but rebalancing labour market, and inflation moving down towards 2 per cent on a sometimes bumpy path" was going to make the timing of an easing - and possibly even the outcome - anything but certain. The same can be said about the timing of a rate cut in Australia, with expectations being pushed out, and the market pricing in only a 10% chance of a move (down) at the RBA's May meeting. The AFR reported this week that the median forecaster in their survey of 39 economists is tipping November before there's a cut, but their expectations have been extended for the past year.

Other uncertainties remain - including significant geo-political risk as a result of the horrors of Gaza, and the war in Ukraine which has now dragged on for 2 years. (Actually, 10 years if you include Russia's annexation of Crimea in April 2014, and their invasion of Ukraine's Donbas region in August of the same year. In fact, according to Wikipedia the last 10 years have just been the tip of the iceberg as far as Ukraine's invasion record is concerned, with the Mongols laying siege to Kyiv way back in 1240, and the Russians first invading in 1654.

Fast forward, and closer to home, this week former RBA Governor Philip Lowe left the golf course and weighed into politicians over the way Australia's taxation system works, which he said was not fit for purpose - specifically that the GST is too low, and income tax is too high. Longer term readers of Hedge Clippings will note this has been a regular and recurring theme of our Friday afternoon soap-box, but Lowe acknowledged that his call was likely to fall on deaf ears in Canberra. Former Treasury Secretary Dr. Ken Henry - author of the 2009 Henry Tax Review and its 138 (mostly ignored) recommendations - would no doubt agree, although his Review's terms of reference specifically excluded changes to the GST.

That didn't stop Henry demanding change at a book launch earlier in the week, saying that successive governments (of both persuasions) have been and are wasting time, saying we shouldn't be surprised if Australians "avoid and evade tax whenever and wherever they can." Personal income tax accounted for just over 50% of Commonwealth tax receipts in 2023, and are forecast to rise to over 58% in 40 years' time, by which time the "economic dependency ratio", which measures the number of people aged 65 and over relative to those of any age who are employed, is expected to increase from 33.2 per cent to 45.4 per cent. Needless to say we won't be around to witness that in 2064, but we're not leaving our children, and their children, in a very good place.

Incremental changes aren't the answer according to Henry: One hundred thousand years of incremental reform won't get us where we need to be in five years," he said. Sadly, his call for urgency will end up in the waste bin, along with the recommendations in his tax review 15 years ago.

News & Insights

New Funds on FundMonitors.com

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes | Magellan Asset Management

If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Assessing the impact of green bonds

Nikko Asset Management

March 2024

Funds operated by this manager:

Nikko AM ARK Global Disruptive Innovation Fund, Nikko AM Global Share Fund

When Private Equity Would Be Laughed Out of The Boardroom

Redwheel

March 2024

Funds operated by this manager:

Sources:

[1] Richardson, S. and Palhares, D., 2018. (Il) liquidity premium in credit markets: A myth?. The Journal of Fixed Income, 28(3), pp.5-23; Cliff Asness, AQR, (https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/The-Illiquidity-Discount) 

[2] Eaton, G.W., Liu, T. and Officer, M.S., 2021. Rethinking measures of mergers & acquisitions deal premiums. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(3), pp.1097-1126

[3] E.g. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-11/investors-to-increase-allocation-to-private-credit-survey-shows, https://www.pionline.com/pension-funds/calpers-mulls-boosting-private-assets-allocation, https://www.ftadviser.com/investments/2024/02/15/half-of-advisers-to-increase-allocation-to-private-assets/, https://www.funds-europe.com/investors-bullish-about-private-capital-allocation/ 

Key Information
No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risks in any market environment. Past performance is not a guide to future results. The prices of investments and income from them may fall as well as rise and an investor's investment is subject to potential loss, in whole or in part. Forecasts and estimates are based upon subjective assumptions about circumstances and events that may not yet have taken place and may never do so. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author as of the date of publication, and do not necessarily represent the view of Redwheel. This article does not constitute investment advice and the information shown is for illustrative purposes only.

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes

Magellan Asset Management

April 2024

To be a successful investor over the long term, we believe it is critical to understand, and hopefully overcome, common human cognitive or psychological biases that can often lead to poor decisions and investment mistakes. Cognitive biases are 'hard wired', and we are all liable to take shortcuts, oversimplify complex decisions and be overconfident in our decision-making process. Understanding our cognitive biases can lead to better decision making, which is fundamental, in our view, to lowering risk and improving investment returns over time. Below we outline key cognitive biases to be aware of that can lead to poor investment decisions.

1. Confirmation bias

Confirmation bias is the natural human tendency to seek information that confirms an existing conclusion or hypothesis. In our view, confirmation bias can be a significant contributor to investment mistakes. Investors often become overly confident when they repeatedly receive data that validates their decisions. This overconfidence can result in a false sense that nothing is likely to go wrong, which increases the risk of being blindsided when something does go wrong.

To minimise the risk of confirmation bias when investing, we attempt to challenge the status quo and seek information that causes us to question our investment thesis. We are always seeking to 'invert' the investment case to analyse why we might be wrong. We continually revisit our investment case especially considering new information and challenge our assumptions. Conducting thorough research is at the foundation of what we do.

2. Information bias

Information bias is the tendency to make decisions based on useless or irrelevant information. The key in investing is to see the 'forest for the trees' and to carefully evaluate information that is relevant to making a more informed investment decision and to discard (and hopefully ignore) irrelevant information. Investors are bombarded with useless information every day and it is difficult to filter through it to focus on information that is relevant.

In our view, daily share price or market movements usually contain no information that is relevant to an investor who is concerned about the medium-term prospects for an investment, yet there are entire news shows and financial columns dedicated to evaluating movements in share prices on a moment-by- moment basis.

3. Loss aversion/endowment effect

Loss aversion is when people strongly prefer to avoid a loss than make a gain. Closely related to loss aversion is the endowment effect, which occurs when people place a higher value on a good that they own than on an identical good that they do not own. The loss aversion/endowment effect can lead to poor and irrational investment decisions whereby investors hold onto losing investments for too long in the hope that they will eventually recover or sell winning investments too quickly to lock in gains.

The loss-aversion tendency breaks one of the cardinal rules of economics, the measurement of opportunity cost. To be a successful investor over time you must be able to accurately measure opportunity cost and not be anchored to past investment decisions due to the inbuilt human tendency to avoid losses.

It's important to evaluate the opportunity cost associated with retaining an existing investment versus making a new investment in a portfolio. For example, when investors consider selling an existing investment, they may hesitate due to the fear of losing money, even if a new opportunity could bring better returns. So, understanding this balance may help investors make rational decisions to grow their portfolios while managing risk effectively. 

We believe investors would make better investment decisions if they understood their risk tolerance (the amount of risk they are willing to accept in order to achieve their investment goals) and took a disciplined approach to weighing up the opportunity cost between keeping an existing investment or not.

4. Incentive-caused bias

Incentive-caused bias, a concept introduced by renowned investor Charlie Munger, is the tendency for people to act in ways that align with their incentives, rewards, or self-interest, even if those actions are not in their best interest or the best interest of others. The sub-prime housing crisis in the US is a classic case study in incentive-caused bias. Financiers were lending money to borrowers even though they knew the borrowers had appalling credit histories, and in many cases no income or jobs and limited assets.

How did this happen on such a massive scale? We believe the answer can be found in the effect of incentives. At virtually every level of the value chain, there were incentives in place to encourage people to participate. The developers had strong incentive to construct new houses. The mortgage brokers had strong incentive to find people to take out mortgages. The investment banks had a big incentive to pay mortgage brokers to originate loans so that they could package and securitise these loans to sell to investors. The ratings agencies had strong incentive to give AAA ratings to mortgage securities to generate fees, and banks had a big incentive to buy these AAA-rated mortgage securities as they required little capital and produced enormous, leveraged profits.

One of the key factors we focus on when making investment decisions is our evaluation of agency risk. We evaluate the incentives and rewards systems in place at a company, to assess whether they are likely to encourage management to make rational long-term decisions. We prefer companies that have incentive schemes that focus management on the downside as well as the upside and encourage management to return excess cash to shareholders. For example, executive compensation that is overly skewed towards share-option schemes can encourage behaviour that is contrary to the long-term interests of shareholders, such as retention of earnings above those that can be usefully reinvested into the business.

5. Oversimplification tendency

In seeking to understand complex matters people tend to want clear and simple explanations. Unfortunately, some matters are inherently complex or uncertain and do not lend themselves to simple explanations.

In our view, investment mistakes can be made when people oversimplify uncertain or complex matters. Oversimplification bias can lead to poor decisions based on overly simplistic or incomplete analyses of complex investment situations. Underestimating risk or misinterpreting data can have negative impacts on investment strategies. We consider that investors should conduct thorough and comprehensive analyses of investment opportunities, consider multiple perspectives, and seek out diverse sources of information.

A key to successful investing is to stay within your 'circle of competence'. At Magellan part of our 'circle of competence' is to concentrate our investments in areas we consider exhibit a high degree of predictability and to be wary of areas that are highly complex and/or highly uncertain. Our extensive bottom-up stock analysis and industry research is a critical tool in understanding the underlying fundamentals of individual companies, enabling us to make well-informed investment decisions and build portfolios we believe are positioned for long-term success.

6. Hindsight bias

Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to believe that they could have predicted a past outcome accurately, even though they were unable to do so in real-time. As an example, many people claimed "I knew it" when the dot.com bubble burst hit in 1998, however very few predicted it. 

Hindsight bias has the potential to lead to overconfidence in investment knowledge and skills. Investors may start to make irrational and risky decisions as they only remember the instances when they were right and overlook the times when they were wrong. Investors may look for expected outcomes in investment decisions rather than looking at all the possible outcomes. 

In our view, hindsight bias is a dangerous state of mind as it clouds your objectivity when assessing past investment decisions and inhibits your ability to learn from past mistakes. To reduce hindsight bias, we spend considerable time upfront setting out the detailed investment case for each stock, including our estimated return. This enables us to accurately assess our investment history with the benefit of hindsight. We do this for individual stock investments and macroeconomic calls.

7. Bandwagon effect (or herd mentality)

The bandwagon effect, or herd mentality, describes gaining comfort in something because many other people do (or believe) the same. In recent times, we have seen the bandwagon effect or herd mentality with the events that surrounded the GameStop stock event. Where many people saw the rise in stock prices and without proper research jumped on the bandwagon and invested. This impacted a lot of investors who bought the stock due to the fear of missing out and the hype it created.

We believe, to be a successful investor, you must be able to analyse and think independently. Speculative bubbles are typically the result of herd mentality. Herd mentality in investing can overshadow rational decision-making and could increase the risk of financial losses.

Investors need to recognise the feeling of pressure to conform to popular opinion or follow the crowd and instead consider conducting research and analysis before making decisions, as well as seeking alternative views to challenge the consensus.

Our investment process is focussed on deep fundamental research and analysis, backed by an investment team with many years of experience. At the end of the day, we will be right or wrong because our analysis and judgement is either right or wrong. While we don't seek to be contrarian, we have no hesitation in taking 'the road less travelled' if that is what our analysis concludes.

8. Restraint bias

Restraint bias is the tendency to overestimate one's ability to show restraint in the face of temptation. The issue for many investors is how to properly size an investment when they believe they have identified a 'sure winner.' We believe, 'sure thing' investments are exceptionally rare, and many investments are sensitive to changes in assumptions, particularly macroeconomic assumptions.

Investors need to have in place a well-thought-out investment plan that aligns with their financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Having a clear plan in place can help to maintain focus on long-term objectives and avoid making impulsive decisions based on short-term market movements. 

At Magellan, we hardwire restraints or risk controls into our process, which may include placing maximum limitations on stocks and combinations of stocks that we consider carry aggregation risk.

9. Neglect of probability

Humans often overlook or misjudge probabilities when making decisions, including investment decisions. Instead of considering a range of possible outcomes, many people tend to simplify and focus on a single estimate. However, the reality is that any outcome an investor anticipates may just be their best guess or most likely scenario. Around this expected outcome, there's a range of potential results, represented by a distribution curve.

This curve can vary widely depending on the specific characteristics of the business involved. For instance, companies which are well-established and have strong competitive positions, tend to have a narrower range of potential outcomes compared to less mature or more volatile companies, which are more susceptible to economic cycles or competitive pressures.

In our portfolio construction process, we carefully consider the differences in businesses to account for the various risks and probabilities associated with different outcomes. This approach helps us construct portfolios that we believe are better suited to navigate the uncertainties of the market.

Another error investors may make is to overestimate or misprice the risk of very low probability events. That does not mean that 'black swan' events cannot happen, but that overcompensating for very low probability events can be costly for investors.

To seek to mitigate the risk of 'black swan' events, we include businesses in our investment portfolios that we consider are high- quality and long-lasting, purchased at appropriate prices. We believe these companies have a tight range of potential outcomes, reducing the risk of major losses from unexpected events.

If we have real insight that the probability of a 'black swan' event is materially increasing and the pricing is attractive enough to reduce this risk, we will have no hesitation in making a material change to our investment portfolios. However, spotting these events isn't easy and doesn't necessarily depend on how much attention they're getting in the media or the markets. As Warren Buffett famously said, "The biggest mistake in stocks is to buy or sell based on current headlines."

10. Anchoring bias

Anchoring bias is the tendency to rely too heavily on, or anchor to, a past reference or one piece of information when making a decision. There have been many academic studies undertaken on the power of anchoring on decision making. Studies typically get people to focus on a totally random number, like their year of birth or age, before being asked to assign a value to something. The studies show that people are influenced in their answer by, or anchored to, the random number that they have focused on prior to being asked the question.

Looking at the recent share price is a common way investors anchor their decisions. Some people even use a method called technical analysis, which looks at past price movements to predict future ones. However, just because a stock's price was high or low in the past doesn't tell us if it's a good deal now.

Instead of focusing on past prices, we look at whether the current price is lower than what we think the stock is really worth. We don't let past prices influence our decisions. We also don't rely solely on the current price when deciding whether to research a new investment. We want to be ready with well-researched options so we can make smart decisions when prices drop below what we believe is their true value.

Funds operated by this manager:

Magellan Global Fund (Hedged), Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC, Magellan High Conviction Fund, Magellan Infrastructure Fund, Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged), MFG Core Infrastructure Fund

1 Generative AI refers to algorithms that can be used to create new content based on the data they were trained on. This can include audio, images, code, text and more. 
2 Boom in A.I. Prompts a Test of Copyright Law - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 
3 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/new-laws-to-curb-danger-of-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-20240111- p5ewnu.htm
4 Boom in A.I. Prompts a Test of Copyright Law - The New York Times (nytiWmes.com)

Important Information: 

This material has been delivered to you by Magellan Asset Management Limited ABN 31 120 593 946 AFS Licence No. 304 301 ('Magellan') and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation.  This material does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. This material does not constitute an offer or inducement to engage in an investment activity nor does it form part of any offer documentation, offer or invitation to purchase, sell or subscribe for interests in any type of investment product or service. You should obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement ('PDS') and Target Market Determination ('TMD') and consider obtaining professional investment advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making a decision about whether to acquire, or continue to hold, the relevant financial product. A copy of the relevant PDS and TMD relating to a Magellan financial product may be obtained by calling +61 2 9235 4888 or by visiting www.magellangroup.com.au.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and no person guarantees the future performance of any financial product or service, the amount or timing of any return from it, that asset allocations will be met, that it will be able to implement its investment strategy or that its investment objectives will be achieved. This material may contain 'forward-looking statements'. Actual events or results or the actual performance of a Magellan financial product or service may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.

This material may include data, research and other information from third party sources. Magellan makes no guarantee that such information is accurate, complete or timely and does not provide any warranties regarding results obtained from its use. This information is subject to change at any time and no person has any responsibility to update any of the information provided in this material.  Statements contained in this material that are not historical facts are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, opinions and beliefs of Magellan. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. No representation or warranty is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this material. Magellan will not be responsible or liable for any losses arising from your use or reliance upon any part of the information contained in this material.

Any third party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and Magellan claims no ownership in, nor any affiliation with, such trademarks.   Any third party trademarks that appear in this material are used for information purposes and only to identify the company names or brands of their respective owners. No affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement should be inferred from the use of these trademarks. This material and the information contained within it may not be reproduced, or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Magellan.

New Funds on FundMonitors.com

Below are some of the funds we've recently added to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research, platform availability, and news & insights. 

View Profile

View Profile

Want to see more funds?

Subscribe for full access to these funds and over 800 others

Hedge Clippings | 28 March 2024

Taylor Swift saved the day for February retail sales - or possibly just diverted the consumers' spending away from their normal patterns. Without the one-off impact of 600,000 "Swifties" (including Albo, who took time off from the affairs of State to attend at least one of the seven concerts) the month's retail sales at 0.1% would have only just made it into the positive. Add in the combined effect of concert tickets, clothing, merchandising, accessories, and dining out, and the number nudged up to 0.3%. While some of that would have diverted spending from other outlets and spending, much of the hard earned cash of the Swifties would have left with Taylor herself partly as ticket sales, and partly royalties on clothing and merchandise.

Hedge Clippings - unlike Albo - didn't get swept up in the hysteria, although we have to admit that many years ago there was a phenomenon known as Beatle Mania which did get our attention. Having not heard much of it we can't comment on Taylor's music, but amazingly still remember the words of most Lennon & McCartney numbers from many years ago.

Meanwhile, household wealth data, also released today continued to rise strongly in the December quarter, up 2.8% on the back of strong residential property (+1.2%) and share prices, locally and overseas which added another 1.3% to the total. Monthly CPI came in at 3.4% in the year to February, which is the third flat month in a row, a fact that won't be lost on the RBA when they next meet in May, missing the April meeting under the new schedule. The RBA has been fence sitting for a while (since last November in fact when they increased rates the last time) and they won't be happy until the inflation number shows real progress. That progress may be delayed by recent and upcoming wage increases, plus Stage lll tax cuts due to flow from July.

During the week we had a glimpse into the thinking behind the outcome of November's US election result courtesy of an invitation to Kings Gate Capital's Expert Investor Panel. The logic went thus: Both candidates are clear contenders for their party nomination - although with an outlier that Trump still has some legal and financial hurdles to overcome, and Biden still has to ensure he doesn't stumble and mumble (or worse) too badly before then.

Assuming each overcomes their respective issues, there are two factors which may/will affect the outcome: Firslty ad spend, which Reuters expects to increase by one third over the previous campaign in 2020. Biden is outspending Trump by a significant multiple, and assuming the advertising works - otherwise why would they do it - that will have some effect.

Secondly, and possibly more importantly with voting not being compulsory, will be the voter turn-out numbers - not necessarily the total, but the numbers from each side of the electorate. While Trump has his Republican MAGA followers, who will always support him, there are a group of died-in-the-wool Republicans who, while they'll never vote Democrat, can't bring themselves to vote for Trump.

Equally, Trump's combination of personality and legal issues will encourage normally non-voting Democrats to turn out to vote on the day, even if they're not convinced by Biden's candidature to do so.

Of course that makes Trump the dominant player on the day - just as he'd like it. Unless the outcome is the same as in 2020!

News & Insights

New Funds on FundMonitors.com

Market Update | Australian Secure Capital Fund

February 2024 Performance News

Bennelong Australian Equities Fund

Digital Asset Fund (Digital Opportunities Class)

PURE Resources Fund

Equitable Investors Dragonfly Fund

PURE Income & Growth Fund

If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Planting the seed of change: real estate's role in the nature crisis

abrdn

March 2024

Funds operated by this manager:

Aberdeen Standard Actively Hedged International Equities Fund, Aberdeen Standard Asian Opportunities Fund, Aberdeen Standard Australian Small Companies Fund, Aberdeen Standard Emerging Opportunities Fund, Aberdeen Standard Ex-20 Australian Equities Fund (Class A), Aberdeen Standard Focused Sustainable Australian Equity Fund, Aberdeen Standard Fully Hedged International Equities Fund, Aberdeen Standard Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund, Aberdeen Standard Global Corporate Bond Fund, Aberdeen Standard International Equity Fund, Aberdeen Standard Multi Asset Real Return Fund, Aberdeen Standard Multi-Asset Income Fund

Source:

^1. United Nations Environment Programme (March 2022) Managing Transition Risk in Real Estate: Aligning to the Paris Climate Accord. 
^2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human wellbeing. Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.