NEWS

6 Feb 2019 - Performance Report: Loftus Peak Global Disruption Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | The investment process involves a combination of top-down analysis with fundamental bottom-up qualitative and quantitative research to derive a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation of companies in the target universe. The investment team will generally buy stocks from the pool of securities that are trading below Loftus Peaks' valuation and sell them when they are trading above Loftus Peak's valuation. The approach allows for both fundamental accounting information as well as market-oriented inputs to be factored into the portfolio construction process. Loftus Peak's model typically does not rely on leverage to deliver investment returns and specifically takes into account risk in the valuation process. Capital preservation can be managed by holding up to 50% cash. Index and currency options and futures may also be used to manage risk. |
Manager Comments | The Fund returned -5.49% in December, with the largest detractors being Nvidia, Alibaba and Baidu. Key contributors included Tencent, Broadcom and Qualcomm. The value of the Fund's USD positions rose after the AUD depreciated 3.75% against the USD during the month. As at 31 December 2018, the Fund carried a foreign currency exposure of 99%. The Fund is 94% invested in 22 holdings which the manager considers likely outperformers. The balance is cash. The Fund's top 5 holdings are Tencent (7.7% of the portfolio), Apple (7.4%), Nvidia (7.3%), Alibaba (7.1%) and Qualcomm (6.8%). |
More Information |

5 Feb 2019 - Australian property - harsh comparisons from history - part 1

5 Feb 2019 - Performance Report: Bennelong Australian Equities Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | The Bennelong Australian Equities Fund seeks quality investment opportunities which are under-appreciated and have the potential to deliver positive earnings. The investment process combines bottom-up fundamental analysis with proprietary investment tools that are used to build and maintain high quality portfolios that are risk aware. The investment team manages an extensive company/industry contact program which helps identify and verify various investment opportunities. The companies within the portfolio are primarily selected from, but not limited to, the S&P/ASX 300 Index. The Fund may invest in securities listed on other exchanges where such securities relate to the ASX-listed securities. The Fund typically holds between 25-60 stocks with a maximum net targeted position of an individual stock of 6%. |
Manager Comments | Detractors over the quarter included Aristocrat Leisure, Corporate Travel Management and Flight Centre. Key contributors included Costa Group, Goodman Group and BHP Billiton. Bennelong noted the sell-off throughout the December quarter came about with a shift in investor sentiment to one of 'risk-off', thus resulting in REITs, utilities, gold stocks and big-cap defensives such as Woolworths holding up well as investors sought safety. Importantly, they noted, company fundamentals mattered little. Bennelong believe safety (and returns) ultimately derive from company fundamentals, which include one's competitive position, balance sheet strength, cash-flow generation and growth prospects. They believe the risk-off sentiment will tire and fundamentals will ultimately win out. |
More Information |

4 Feb 2019 - Performance Report: Insync Global Capital Aware Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | Insync employs four simple screens to narrow the universe of over 40,000 listed companies globally to a focus group of high quality companies that it believes have the potential to consistently grow their profits and dividends. These screens are size of the company, balance sheet performance, valuation and dividend quality. Companies that pass this due diligence process are then valued using dividend discount models, free cash flow yield and proprietary implied growth and expected return models. The end result is a high conviction portfolio of typically 15-30 stocks. The principal investments will be in shares of companies listed on international stock exchanges (including the US, Europe and Asia). The Fund may also hold cash, derivatives (for example futures, options and swaps), currency contracts, American Depository Receipts and Global Depository Receipts. The Fund may also invest in various types of international pooled investment vehicles. At times, Insync may consider holding higher levels of cash if valuations are full and it is difficult to find attractive investment opportunities. When Insync believes markets to be overvalued, it may hold part of its resources in cash, or use derivatives as a way of reducing its equity exposure. Insync may use options, futures and other derivatives to reduce risk or gain exposure to underlying physical investments. The Fund may purchase put options on market indices or specific stocks to hedge against losses caused by declines in the prices of stocks in its portfolio. |
Manager Comments | The Insync Global Capital Aware Fund returned -0.74% in December, outperforming the Global Equity benchmark by +2.92% and taking 12-month performance to +4.56% versus the Global Equity benchmark's +0.64%. The Fund's significant outperformance this month highlights the benefit of Insync's put-option protection strategy, especially considering that the Fund's return after fees but before protection was -2.83%. |
More Information |

1 Feb 2019 - Hedge Clippings - 01 February, 2019
A couple of things on Hedge Clippings' radar today… including the Hayne Royal Commission's report delivered to the Government today prior to being made public next week (assuming some politician doesn't leak it earlier, but they wouldn't do that would they?), an article published in today's Australian showing the number of inactive accounts in the superannuation system as exposed by the Productivity Commission, and the US 10 year bond rate which influenced the US Fed's Policy change.
Let's start with ghost accounts and the revenue they make for superannuation funds at their members' expense. With 25 million super accounts in the system, and 7.8 million of them being inactive or duplications, the funds are ripping a staggering $2.6 billion a year out of their members' combined balances. Surely there's a simple way to prevent this - namely requiring each person's Tax File Number to be used as the core and common identifier on every super account.
When first coming into the work force every employee has to apply for a TFN, and has to choose a super fund. When changing employer, and/or opening a new super account, this would, or could, throw up an immediate flag with the option to switch, close or combine accounts.
Of course, using the TFN would alarm the alarmists, who would claim it was a stealthy way to introduce a common identifier - a.k.a. the Australia Card - even though it already exists. However, the $2.6 billion a year in fee savings could more than pay for its introduction! While it may sound simple to Hedge Clippings, don't expect the superannuation industry to support the idea and wave goodbye to all those fees for no reason.
As far as the Commissioner Hayne's final report is concerned there's no doubt he'll be forthright. Having already given us a taste in his courtroom, and the interim report, the final version is unlikely to have any major revelations but will undoubtably have some firm recommendations. We hope these don't only focus or result in more legislation and red tape; rather enforcement of the existing requirements in the Corporations Act to operate fairly, efficiently and honestly, and a lengthy zebra suntan for those deliberately and consistently found to have not been doing so.
Both the HRC and the PC's findings and recommendations are going to be negatively affected by the upcoming election and whichever party and their respective vested self interest groups is in power after election night. This will be disappointing, as there's a risk that both the HRC and PC's findings run risk of going the same way as Ken Henry's review of the taxation system.
For those who can't recall the Henry Review, a.k.a. Australia's Future Tax System Review, it was commissioned back in 2008 under Kevin Rudd's 2020 summit (help! we're nearly there), and released in 2010. Unfortunately, superannuation was excluded from the review (how bright was that?) but there were still 139 recommendations, of which over 100 ended up in Canberra's waste paper basket. One of the one's that did make it into law was the Mineral Resource Rent Tax, which in 2014 eventually went the way of the dodo under Tony Abbott.
Elsewhere on this week's radar: Mid last year there were expectations of a continued Fed tightening, and concerns about the US 10 year bond rate rising above 3%, which subsequently came to pass, spiking to 3.24% in November. As a result, this helped to spoil the equity bull market which had been built in part on the prolonged era of QE, low rates and easy money, with the US market taking a tumble in the 4th quarter, aided of course by Trump's arm wrestle with China's President (for life) Xi.
Fast forward and new Fed chair Jerome Powell reversed tightening expectations overnight, and with the US 10 year bond rate having fallen to 2.7%, once again making equities attractive on a relative yield and risk basis - as a comparison the dividend yield on the S&P500 last year was less than 2%, although the risk remains.

1 Feb 2019 - Performance Report: Bennelong Kardinia Absolute Return Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | The Fund's discretionary investment strategy commences with a macro view of the economy and direction to establish the portfolio's desired market exposure. Following this detailed sector and company research is gathered from knowledge of the individual stocks in the Fund's universe, with widespread use of broker research. Company visits, presentations and discussions with management at CEO and CFO level are used wherever possible to assess management quality across a range of criteria. Detailed analysis of company valuations using financial statements and forecasts, particularly focusing on free cash flow, is conducted. Technical analysis is used to validate the Manager's fundamental research and valuations and to manage market timing. A significant portion of the Fund's overall performance can be attributed to the attention and importance given to the macro economic outlook and the ability and willingness to adjust the Fund's market risk. |
Manager Comments | The Fund returned -2.02% in December. Top contributors included Northern Star (+37bp contribution), Evolution Mining (+26bp), BHP (+34bp) and Rio Tinto (+21bp). The individual stock short book also performed well (+11bp), with shorts in the financial services and waste management sectors the key contributors. Detractors included ANZ (-87bp), NAB (-22bp), Nine Entertainment (-43bp), Macquarie Group (-25bp) and Netwealth (-17bp). Net equity market exposure was reduced from 47.3% to 30.4% (41.7% long and 11.3% short), with the key changes being new positions in Northern Star, Evolution Mining, Transurban and Woolworths, the closure of a short position in Share Price Index Futures contracts offset by seven new individual stock short positions as well as the sale of ANZ, NAB, Westpac and Nine Entertainment. |
More Information |

1 Feb 2019 - Markets Anti-Predictions For 2019

31 Jan 2019 - Australia is heading for a housing-driven economic slowdown

31 Jan 2019 - Performance Report: Cyan C3G Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | Cyan C3G Fund is based on the investment philosophy which can be defined as a comprehensive, clear and considered process focused on delivering growth. These are identified through stringent filter criteria and a rigorous research process. The Manager uses a proprietary stock filter in order to eliminate a large proportion of investments due to both internal characteristics (such as gearing levels or cash flow) and external characteristics (such as exposure to commodity prices or customer concentration). Typically, the Fund looks for businesses that are one or more of: a) under researched, b) fundamentally undervalued, c) have a catalyst for re-rating. The Manager seeks to achieve this investment outcome by actively managing a portfolio of Australian listed securities. When the opportunity to invest in suitable securities cannot be found, the manager may reduce the level of equities exposure and accumulate a defensive cash position. Whilst it is the company's intention, there is no guarantee that any distributions or returns will be declared, or that if declared, the amount of any returns will remain constant or increase over time. The Fund does not invest in derivatives and does not use debt to leverage the Fund's performance. However, companies in which the Fund invests may be leveraged. |
Manager Comments | Cyan noted the challenging market sentiment accelerated in December, impacting performance to the tune of -4.2%. This return was not attributed to any adverse stock specific news, a characteristic which Cyan believe is reassuring. In addition, in light of the bearish conditions, the Fund experienced 4 positions that rose, 3 that were flat and 17 that fell. Detractors included Murray River Organics (-16%), Experience Co (-13%) and AMA Group (-14%). Cyan say their views have not changed much from previous months, other than that company specific value appears to be increasingly attractive. Cyan emphasised that when assessing prospective investees they look at individual companies rather than overall markets and, given their strong growth profiles, they wholly believe that the companies in the Cyan C3G Fund will have more intrinsic value at the end of CY19 than they do presently. |
More Information |
