Assessing the impact of green bonds

5 Apr 2024 - Nikko Asset Management

Which metrics matter most to green bond investors?

5 Apr 2024 - Assessing the impact of green bonds

By: Nikko Asset Management

Assessing the impact of green bonds

Nikko Asset Management

March 2024

The green bond market has experienced tremendous growth since 2007, but despite its rapid success, there are still barriers to overcome. In particular, assessing the impact of green bonds continues to be a contentious topic.

Due to a lack of standardisation among both issuers and regulators, gathering, grouping and communicating fund-level impact data is challenging, as are efforts to ensure green bonds continue to represent the interests and requirements of investors. Nonetheless, measuring the impact of green bonds is an essential component in ensuring their continued success.

Which metrics matter most to green bond investors?

As one would expect given the increasing appetite to understand the real impact of investments, most green bond investors track alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). SDGs are a great basis for mapping the use of proceeds to clear and understandable environmental and social outcomes.

Indeed, many of the most common metrics required by investors - including greenhouse gas reductions, CO2 emissions avoided and carbon intensity--have become established components in impact reports from issuers. Please see an Environmental Finance survey from 2022 in Charts 1 and 2.

Green, Social, Sustainability and Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles designed by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) have been widely accepted as the common framework to provide transparency on the issuance of labelled bonds. All issuers aligned to ICMA Principles are committed to report on the allocation of proceeds, which is generally accompanied by impact metrics.

While the IMCA Principles are a useful starting point to gather and compare how proceeds are being used by issuers, and the impact they have, the principles themselves are broad and not prescriptive. This means that the reporting quality and consistency between issuers can still vary widely. Some issuers will report their allocation on an aggregated portfolio basis, rather than on a bond-by-bond basis. Others may not specify what proportion of a specific project is financed by the green bond proceeds--making it almost impossible to measure bond-specific impact.

In recognition of this, while adhering to IMCA Principles is a good starting point, investors seeking to meaningfully understand the impact of green bonds and want to be able to compare and contrast between different green bonds, continue to demand better quality impact reporting from bond issuers, and increasingly look to do so through issuer engagement.

Chart 1: What environmental metrics are your firm most interested in?

Source: Environmental Finance survey (2022)

Chart 2: What are your firm's main criteria when choosing a green bond fund to invest in?

Source: Environmental Finance survey (2022)

Engagement throughout the lifecycle

The IIGCC Net Zero Bondholder Stewardship Guidance advocates a long-term financing lifecycle-based approach. This presents a useful illustration on how engagement can support better impact measurement and reporting. The lifecycle includes the following steps:

Pre-issuance engagement based on financed emissions, refinancing pipeline, and net zero alignment.
Issuer and issuance alignment of climate and net zero commitments, targets and covenants, and monitoring this alignment over time.
Collaborative approach across the bond market ecosystem including issuers, investors, Debt Capital Markets (DCM) syndicate, banks, SPOs, rating agencies, index providers, regulators and policymakers.
Engagement progress and outcomes to clearly link stewardship to investment decisions, and steer responsible capital allocation.

Chart 3: Bond market ecosystem

Source: https://www.iigcc.org/resources/net-zero-bondholder-stewardship-guidance

Regulatory challenges

New 2023 requirements surrounding the introduction of the EU Taxonomy have imposed additional regulatory responsibilities on fund managers. While initially focusing on climate environmental objectives, 2023 revisions have included a wider set of sustainably-orientated economic activities, namely:

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
Transition to a circular economy
Pollution prevention and control
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems

Nikko AM's perspective is that although the EU Taxonomy is helpful for determining whether an economic activity can be considered environmentally sustainable, it is not the only approach and is less well adapted to companies beyond the EU. The EU Taxonomy could be considered as sometimes too stringent in its quantitative demands, given the availability and quality of data. Currently we do not use the EU Taxonomy to measure impact in our own funds. That said, we do recognise it has value in terms of monitoring, as well as highlighting certain key elements that any sustainable investment process should possess.

What next for green bond fund impact reporting?

Although impact reporting among green bond issuers is improving, the quality and consistency of impact reporting can still vary significantly. Without being properly addressed, this lack of standardisation on reporting could have deeper consequences for the industry as a whole. The lack of consistent data is not only an issue for our own analysis but also for our client's reporting expectations. The less transparent an issuer is, the less likely the bond will be included in a sustainable fund. However, progress is being made, and the global significance of green bonds means that specialist data providers are increasingly looking to provide comparable impact data for analysis and reporting, using assumptions and methodology to understand impact.

Funds operated by this manager:

Nikko AM ARK Global Disruptive Innovation Fund, Nikko AM Global Share Fund

Important disclaimer information
Please note that much of the content which appears on this page is intended for the use of professional investors only.

When Private Equity Would Be Laughed Out of The Boardroom

4 Apr 2024 - Redwheel

In recent decades, fuelled by lower and lower interest rates, we observe many large investors across the world have been re-allocating funds away from public markets, and into private assets - be those private equity or private credit vehicles.

4 Apr 2024 - When Private Equity Would Be Laughed Out of The Boardroom

By: Redwheel

When Private Equity Would Be Laughed Out of The Boardroom

Redwheel

March 2024

In recent decades, fuelled by lower and lower interest rates, we observe many large investors across the world have been re-allocating funds away from public markets, and into private assets - be those private equity or private credit vehicles. The theory behind this approach is that there is an 'illiquidity premium' to be earned by owning assets that are locked up for longer, boosting the returns of the investors relative to those who own assets that are freely traded on the open market.

Leaving aside the veracity of that conjecture - with some who have argued plausibly that, in fact, investors pay not to see the mark-to-market volatility of their portfolios [1] - one curious aspect of the private markets, as compared to public markets, is worth noting.

When buying companies outright, private investors necessarily need to negotiate over a single price for the entire company, a process involving numerous Board members, bankers, lawyers and accountants on all fronts, not to mention the shareholders who will be the ultimate beneficiaries of the sale proceeds. In that process, it is common for bidders to offer a "control premium", an excess of the current market price of the company that convinces shareholders to sell, and ostensibly represents the value to the buyer of having control of the company. These premiums can range anywhere between 10% and 100% in excess of the current market value of the company, with average premiums in the ~40% range, a figure we would view as not insubstantial.[2]

Source: Bloomberg, at 11 March 2024. 2024 control premium is year-to-date. The information show above is for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or advice.

By contrast, when public market investors like us want to invest in a company, we don't consult the Board or its advisors on what price they'd like us to pay - we just go into the market and buy shares from whomever is willing to sell them to us, at the prevailing price, even if that price is so low that a Board of Directors would never dream of accepting it for the entire enterprise.

By its nature, then, buying the same previously-listed company in a private equity fund or structure will cost more than simply buying shares on the open market - increasing the hurdle of corporate performance that will be required to earn investors a good return. In this sense, we believe us public market investors have a huge advantage, with the ability to make purchases at prices which we consider often so ludicrously low that any private equity firm - when trying to pay the same price for the entire company - will be quite literally laughed out of the Boardroom.

This is more than simple conjecture: in the past two weeks, two companies held in our portfolios - Curry's and Direct Line Group - have received unsolicited buyout offers from parties seeking to take them private, and both have (we think quite rightly) firmly rejected those offers as materially too low.

Of course, no one made any such objections or consternations to us when we bought our shares on the London Stock Exchange for those same companies at similar prices (or, dare we admit, even lower prices). It is intriguing, then, that many large institutional investors - principally large pension funds - continue to eschew public markets in favour of private markets [3], especially in markets such as the UK, where public market valuations are undemanding in our view.

Yet, as the Curry's and Direct Line example shows, this discount is not available to private bidders at prevailing prices: Boards are well aware of the despondency embedded in their market valuation, and are not going to let their shareholders be wrestled out of their companies for unfair prices. If you are the Trustee of a pension fund investing in private markets, then, you may wish to ask your CIO if they allocate to investors paying a premium to own the same assets that we get to buy without one.

As value investors, we aim to earn a superior investment return over the long-term by paying material discounts to intrinsic business value. This opportunity, however, is effectively available only in public markets, where we can buy small pieces of companies - which is, after all, what shares truly are - from sellers on the open market, and to do so at prices that we consider as so eye watering that any self-respecting private bidder would not dare to suggest.

As Curry's and Direct Line bidders Elliot and Ageas have learned recently, there are some potentially fantastic opportunities available in the public markets - but that these are often available only to public equity investors, and are perhaps simply too good for private bidders to access.

Author: Shaul Rosten

Funds operated by this manager:

Redwheel China Equity Fund, Redwheel Global Emerging Markets Fund

Sources:

[1] Richardson, S. and Palhares, D., 2018. (Il) liquidity premium in credit markets: A myth?. The Journal of Fixed Income, 28(3), pp.5-23; Cliff Asness, AQR, (https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/The-Illiquidity-Discount)

[2] Eaton, G.W., Liu, T. and Officer, M.S., 2021. Rethinking measures of mergers & acquisitions deal premiums. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(3), pp.1097-1126

[3] E.g. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-11/investors-to-increase-allocation-to-private-credit-survey-shows, https://www.pionline.com/pension-funds/calpers-mulls-boosting-private-assets-allocation, https://www.ftadviser.com/investments/2024/02/15/half-of-advisers-to-increase-allocation-to-private-assets/, https://www.funds-europe.com/investors-bullish-about-private-capital-allocation/

Key Information
No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risks in any market environment. Past performance is not a guide to future results. The prices of investments and income from them may fall as well as rise and an investor's investment is subject to potential loss, in whole or in part. Forecasts and estimates are based upon subjective assumptions about circumstances and events that may not yet have taken place and may never do so. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author as of the date of publication, and do not necessarily represent the view of Redwheel. This article does not constitute investment advice and the information shown is for illustrative purposes only.

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes

3 Apr 2024 - Magellan Asset Management

Cognitive biases are 'hard wired', and we are all liable to take shortcuts, oversimplify complex decisions and be overconfident in our decision-making process.

3 Apr 2024 - 10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes

By: Magellan Asset Management

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes

Magellan Asset Management

April 2024

To be a successful investor over the long term, we believe it is critical to understand, and hopefully overcome, common human cognitive or psychological biases that can often lead to poor decisions and investment mistakes. Cognitive biases are 'hard wired', and we are all liable to take shortcuts, oversimplify complex decisions and be overconfident in our decision-making process. Understanding our cognitive biases can lead to better decision making, which is fundamental, in our view, to lowering risk and improving investment returns over time. Below we outline key cognitive biases to be aware of that can lead to poor investment decisions.

1. Confirmation bias

Confirmation bias is the natural human tendency to seek information that confirms an existing conclusion or hypothesis. In our view, confirmation bias can be a significant contributor to investment mistakes. Investors often become overly confident when they repeatedly receive data that validates their decisions. This overconfidence can result in a false sense that nothing is likely to go wrong, which increases the risk of being blindsided when something does go wrong.

To minimise the risk of confirmation bias when investing, we attempt to challenge the status quo and seek information that causes us to question our investment thesis. We are always seeking to 'invert' the investment case to analyse why we might be wrong. We continually revisit our investment case especially considering new information and challenge our assumptions. Conducting thorough research is at the foundation of what we do.

2. Information bias

Information bias is the tendency to make decisions based on useless or irrelevant information. The key in investing is to see the 'forest for the trees' and to carefully evaluate information that is relevant to making a more informed investment decision and to discard (and hopefully ignore) irrelevant information. Investors are bombarded with useless information every day and it is difficult to filter through it to focus on information that is relevant.

In our view, daily share price or market movements usually contain no information that is relevant to an investor who is concerned about the medium-term prospects for an investment, yet there are entire news shows and financial columns dedicated to evaluating movements in share prices on a moment-by- moment basis.

3. Loss aversion/endowment effect

Loss aversion is when people strongly prefer to avoid a loss than make a gain. Closely related to loss aversion is the endowment effect, which occurs when people place a higher value on a good that they own than on an identical good that they do not own. The loss aversion/endowment effect can lead to poor and irrational investment decisions whereby investors hold onto losing investments for too long in the hope that they will eventually recover or sell winning investments too quickly to lock in gains.

The loss-aversion tendency breaks one of the cardinal rules of economics, the measurement of opportunity cost. To be a successful investor over time you must be able to accurately measure opportunity cost and not be anchored to past investment decisions due to the inbuilt human tendency to avoid losses.

It's important to evaluate the opportunity cost associated with retaining an existing investment versus making a new investment in a portfolio. For example, when investors consider selling an existing investment, they may hesitate due to the fear of losing money, even if a new opportunity could bring better returns. So, understanding this balance may help investors make rational decisions to grow their portfolios while managing risk effectively.

We believe investors would make better investment decisions if they understood their risk tolerance (the amount of risk they are willing to accept in order to achieve their investment goals) and took a disciplined approach to weighing up the opportunity cost between keeping an existing investment or not.

4. Incentive-caused bias

Incentive-caused bias, a concept introduced by renowned investor Charlie Munger, is the tendency for people to act in ways that align with their incentives, rewards, or self-interest, even if those actions are not in their best interest or the best interest of others. The sub-prime housing crisis in the US is a classic case study in incentive-caused bias. Financiers were lending money to borrowers even though they knew the borrowers had appalling credit histories, and in many cases no income or jobs and limited assets.

How did this happen on such a massive scale? We believe the answer can be found in the effect of incentives. At virtually every level of the value chain, there were incentives in place to encourage people to participate. The developers had strong incentive to construct new houses. The mortgage brokers had strong incentive to find people to take out mortgages. The investment banks had a big incentive to pay mortgage brokers to originate loans so that they could package and securitise these loans to sell to investors. The ratings agencies had strong incentive to give AAA ratings to mortgage securities to generate fees, and banks had a big incentive to buy these AAA-rated mortgage securities as they required little capital and produced enormous, leveraged profits.

One of the key factors we focus on when making investment decisions is our evaluation of agency risk. We evaluate the incentives and rewards systems in place at a company, to assess whether they are likely to encourage management to make rational long-term decisions. We prefer companies that have incentive schemes that focus management on the downside as well as the upside and encourage management to return excess cash to shareholders. For example, executive compensation that is overly skewed towards share-option schemes can encourage behaviour that is contrary to the long-term interests of shareholders, such as retention of earnings above those that can be usefully reinvested into the business.

5. Oversimplification tendency

In seeking to understand complex matters people tend to want clear and simple explanations. Unfortunately, some matters are inherently complex or uncertain and do not lend themselves to simple explanations.

In our view, investment mistakes can be made when people oversimplify uncertain or complex matters. Oversimplification bias can lead to poor decisions based on overly simplistic or incomplete analyses of complex investment situations. Underestimating risk or misinterpreting data can have negative impacts on investment strategies. We consider that investors should conduct thorough and comprehensive analyses of investment opportunities, consider multiple perspectives, and seek out diverse sources of information.

A key to successful investing is to stay within your 'circle of competence'. At Magellan part of our 'circle of competence' is to concentrate our investments in areas we consider exhibit a high degree of predictability and to be wary of areas that are highly complex and/or highly uncertain. Our extensive bottom-up stock analysis and industry research is a critical tool in understanding the underlying fundamentals of individual companies, enabling us to make well-informed investment decisions and build portfolios we believe are positioned for long-term success.

6. Hindsight bias

Hindsight bias is the tendency for people to believe that they could have predicted a past outcome accurately, even though they were unable to do so in real-time. As an example, many people claimed "I knew it" when the dot.com bubble burst hit in 1998, however very few predicted it.

Hindsight bias has the potential to lead to overconfidence in investment knowledge and skills. Investors may start to make irrational and risky decisions as they only remember the instances when they were right and overlook the times when they were wrong. Investors may look for expected outcomes in investment decisions rather than looking at all the possible outcomes.

In our view, hindsight bias is a dangerous state of mind as it clouds your objectivity when assessing past investment decisions and inhibits your ability to learn from past mistakes. To reduce hindsight bias, we spend considerable time upfront setting out the detailed investment case for each stock, including our estimated return. This enables us to accurately assess our investment history with the benefit of hindsight. We do this for individual stock investments and macroeconomic calls.

7. Bandwagon effect (or herd mentality)

The bandwagon effect, or herd mentality, describes gaining comfort in something because many other people do (or believe) the same. In recent times, we have seen the bandwagon effect or herd mentality with the events that surrounded the GameStop stock event. Where many people saw the rise in stock prices and without proper research jumped on the bandwagon and invested. This impacted a lot of investors who bought the stock due to the fear of missing out and the hype it created.

We believe, to be a successful investor, you must be able to analyse and think independently. Speculative bubbles are typically the result of herd mentality. Herd mentality in investing can overshadow rational decision-making and could increase the risk of financial losses.

Investors need to recognise the feeling of pressure to conform to popular opinion or follow the crowd and instead consider conducting research and analysis before making decisions, as well as seeking alternative views to challenge the consensus.

Our investment process is focussed on deep fundamental research and analysis, backed by an investment team with many years of experience. At the end of the day, we will be right or wrong because our analysis and judgement is either right or wrong. While we don't seek to be contrarian, we have no hesitation in taking 'the road less travelled' if that is what our analysis concludes.

8. Restraint bias

Restraint bias is the tendency to overestimate one's ability to show restraint in the face of temptation. The issue for many investors is how to properly size an investment when they believe they have identified a 'sure winner.' We believe, 'sure thing' investments are exceptionally rare, and many investments are sensitive to changes in assumptions, particularly macroeconomic assumptions.

Investors need to have in place a well-thought-out investment plan that aligns with their financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Having a clear plan in place can help to maintain focus on long-term objectives and avoid making impulsive decisions based on short-term market movements.

At Magellan, we hardwire restraints or risk controls into our process, which may include placing maximum limitations on stocks and combinations of stocks that we consider carry aggregation risk.

9. Neglect of probability

Humans often overlook or misjudge probabilities when making decisions, including investment decisions. Instead of considering a range of possible outcomes, many people tend to simplify and focus on a single estimate. However, the reality is that any outcome an investor anticipates may just be their best guess or most likely scenario. Around this expected outcome, there's a range of potential results, represented by a distribution curve.

This curve can vary widely depending on the specific characteristics of the business involved. For instance, companies which are well-established and have strong competitive positions, tend to have a narrower range of potential outcomes compared to less mature or more volatile companies, which are more susceptible to economic cycles or competitive pressures.

In our portfolio construction process, we carefully consider the differences in businesses to account for the various risks and probabilities associated with different outcomes. This approach helps us construct portfolios that we believe are better suited to navigate the uncertainties of the market.

Another error investors may make is to overestimate or misprice the risk of very low probability events. That does not mean that 'black swan' events cannot happen, but that overcompensating for very low probability events can be costly for investors.

To seek to mitigate the risk of 'black swan' events, we include businesses in our investment portfolios that we consider are high- quality and long-lasting, purchased at appropriate prices. We believe these companies have a tight range of potential outcomes, reducing the risk of major losses from unexpected events.

If we have real insight that the probability of a 'black swan' event is materially increasing and the pricing is attractive enough to reduce this risk, we will have no hesitation in making a material change to our investment portfolios. However, spotting these events isn't easy and doesn't necessarily depend on how much attention they're getting in the media or the markets. As Warren Buffett famously said, "The biggest mistake in stocks is to buy or sell based on current headlines."

10. Anchoring bias

Anchoring bias is the tendency to rely too heavily on, or anchor to, a past reference or one piece of information when making a decision. There have been many academic studies undertaken on the power of anchoring on decision making. Studies typically get people to focus on a totally random number, like their year of birth or age, before being asked to assign a value to something. The studies show that people are influenced in their answer by, or anchored to, the random number that they have focused on prior to being asked the question.

Looking at the recent share price is a common way investors anchor their decisions. Some people even use a method called technical analysis, which looks at past price movements to predict future ones. However, just because a stock's price was high or low in the past doesn't tell us if it's a good deal now.

Instead of focusing on past prices, we look at whether the current price is lower than what we think the stock is really worth. We don't let past prices influence our decisions. We also don't rely solely on the current price when deciding whether to research a new investment. We want to be ready with well-researched options so we can make smart decisions when prices drop below what we believe is their true value.

Funds operated by this manager:

Magellan Global Fund (Hedged), Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC, Magellan High Conviction Fund, Magellan Infrastructure Fund, Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged), MFG Core Infrastructure Fund

1 Generative AI refers to algorithms that can be used to create new content based on the data they were trained on. This can include audio, images, code, text and more.
2 Boom in A.I. Prompts a Test of Copyright Law - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
3 https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/new-laws-to-curb-danger-of-high-risk-artificial-intelligence-20240111- p5ewnu.htm
4 Boom in A.I. Prompts a Test of Copyright Law - The New York Times (nytiWmes.com)

Important Information:

This material has been delivered to you by Magellan Asset Management Limited ABN 31 120 593 946 AFS Licence No. 304 301 ('Magellan') and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. This material does not constitute an offer or inducement to engage in an investment activity nor does it form part of any offer documentation, offer or invitation to purchase, sell or subscribe for interests in any type of investment product or service. You should obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement ('PDS') and Target Market Determination ('TMD') and consider obtaining professional investment advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making a decision about whether to acquire, or continue to hold, the relevant financial product. A copy of the relevant PDS and TMD relating to a Magellan financial product may be obtained by calling +61 2 9235 4888 or by visiting www.magellangroup.com.au.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and no person guarantees the future performance of any financial product or service, the amount or timing of any return from it, that asset allocations will be met, that it will be able to implement its investment strategy or that its investment objectives will be achieved. This material may contain 'forward-looking statements'. Actual events or results or the actual performance of a Magellan financial product or service may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.

This material may include data, research and other information from third party sources. Magellan makes no guarantee that such information is accurate, complete or timely and does not provide any warranties regarding results obtained from its use. This information is subject to change at any time and no person has any responsibility to update any of the information provided in this material. Statements contained in this material that are not historical facts are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, opinions and beliefs of Magellan. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. No representation or warranty is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this material. Magellan will not be responsible or liable for any losses arising from your use or reliance upon any part of the information contained in this material.

Any third party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and Magellan claims no ownership in, nor any affiliation with, such trademarks. Any third party trademarks that appear in this material are used for information purposes and only to identify the company names or brands of their respective owners. No affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement should be inferred from the use of these trademarks. This material and the information contained within it may not be reproduced, or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Magellan.

ATTACHED FILES

The three factors driving stock returns (pdf format)

New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

2 Apr 2024 - FundMonitors.com

Here are some of the latest additions to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research,...

2 Apr 2024 - New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

By: FundMonitors.com

New Funds on FundMonitors.com

Below are some of the funds we've recently added to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research, platform availability, and news & insights.

Ausbil Global Essential Infrastructure Fund (Hedged)

Inception date:	October 2020	Minimum initial investment:	AU$20,000
Strategy:	Infrastructure	Distributions:	Quarterly
Geographic mandate:	Global	Management fee:	1.00%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

Barwon Global Listed Private Equity Fund

Inception date:	June 2007	Minimum initial investment:	AU$50,000
Strategy:	Private Equity	Distributions:	Annually
Geographic mandate:	Global	Management fee:	0.65%
Investor type:	Wholesale	Performance fee:	15.00%

View Profile

BlackRock Global Impact Fund (Class D)

Inception date:	June 2021	Minimum initial investment:	AU$50,000
Strategy:	Equity Long	Distributions:	Annually
Geographic mandate:	Australia/Global	Management fee:	0.85%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

BlackRock Diversified ESG Stable Fund (Class D)

Inception date:	January 1997	Minimum initial investment:	AU$50,000
Strategy:	Global Diversified	Distributions:	Quarterly
Geographic mandate:	Australia/Global	Management fee:	0.70%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

BlackRock Diversified ESG Growth Fund (Class D)

Inception date:	January 1997	Minimum initial investment:	AU$50,000
Strategy:	Global Diversified	Distributions:	Quarterly
Geographic mandate:	Australia/Global	Management fee:	0.81%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

Want to see more funds?

Subscribe for full access to these funds and over 800 others

Planting the seed of change: real estate's role in the nature crisis

28 Mar 2024 - abrdn

How can real estate reduce its negative impact on nature?

28 Mar 2024 - Planting the seed of change: real estate's role in the nature crisis

By: abrdn

Planting the seed of change: real estate's role in the nature crisis

abrdn

March 2024

Since publishing our climate change approach for our direct real estate portfolio in 2020, we have focused on mitigating climate risks and decarbonising our real estate portfolios. But our real estate environmental, social and governance strategy also considers wider environmental and social topics, including those associated with nature and in particular biodiversity . How can real estate reduce its negative impact on nature? And how can it have a positive impact and contribute to climate solutions?

A focus on nature

We are experiencing a nature and climate crisis. While the spotlight has previously been on climate change, nature is now sharing centre stage. The two issues are interdependent.

Some key initiatives have caused real estate investors to sit up and pay attention to the relationship between buildings and nature.

The final framework of the United Nations' Taskforce for Nature Related Financial Disclosure (TNFD) was released last autumn, which sets out a framework for companies to report their impact on nature.
The introduction of the Biodiversity Net Gain legislation in England in February requires at least a 10% biodiversity net gain for new developments.

How does real estate affect nature?

Real estate contributes directly to four of the five main drivers of nature loss. Therefore, action to reduce the impact in these areas can also reduce risks for real estate assets.

Five drivers of nature loss

Climate change

Buildings contribute to almost 40%[1] of global greenhouse gas emissions because of their heating, lighting and cooling requirements. It is imperative that buildings are decarbonised to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to mitigate climate change.
Resource exploitation

Buildings require raw materials such as cement, steel and sand. The challenge for real estate developers is to understand where and how these are sourced in the supply chain and how to change practices to be more sustainable. For example, developers can use recycled steel and concrete or responsibly sourced timber. This can help reduce the impact on nature and provide a more dependable supply.
Land- and sea-use change

Real estate has changed land use. Legislation, such as the Biodiversity for Net Gain for development in England and Wales, can help to ensure that biodiversity is maintained and improved on-site. This can be achieved by introducing green walls or roofs, and by maintaining existing shrubs and trees. But real estate investors and local authorities should prioritise building on brownfield sites (previously developed land) to avoid expanding into greenbelt areas.
Pollution

Contaminated land risks from fuel or toxic-waste leakages are a concern if waste is stored inappropriately at real estate assets. Prevention and remediation of contamination is essential.
Invasive alien species

While real estate doesn't affect invasive species, certain plants can present risks to real estate investments. For example, Japanese knotweed can de-value an asset and affect the stability of a building.

Green infrastructure creates a positive impact

Real estate provides the unique opportunity to have a positive impact at the construction phase of a building, particularly in terms of design. This may involve maintaining existing green areas or improving habitats that are in poor condition. But it can also have a positive impact in the post-construction phase, by implementing green infrastructure (see examples below). This can promote local biodiversity and contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. Real estate can also have a positive social impact and provide operational efficiencies.

Types of green infrastructure [2]

Sustainable drainage system

Using green infrastructure as a sustainable drainage system can:

- retain 60-72% rainwater run-off, which helps flood mitigation.
- provide 60-80% species richness, which is similar to that of a natural pond.
Street trees

Having trees next to and around buildings can:

- reduce the air temperature by up to three degrees.
- provide carbon sequestration (absorbing carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere.
Green roof

Vegetation growing horizontally on a roof of a building can:

- provide a 6.7% energy saving for the space directly underneath the roof by providing insulation.
- reduce noise by 11 decibels.
Green wall

Vegetation growing vertically on a wall can:

- provide an energy saving of up to 8% for the adjacent space.
- reduce the indoor temperature by 2.7 degrees.
- improve local exterior air quality by removing nitrous oxides.

How does nature benefit real estate investment performance?

Green infrastructure can have a positive impact on people, by improving the aesthetics of a building, reducing energy costs, minimising flood remediation costs and improving local air quality. Studies show that there can be a 10% increase in willingness to pay for assets that offer green cover. Green infrastructure can increase property values by around 9.5%. And buildings in close proximity to parks or green spaces also benefit from higher values. Real estate assets with green infrastructure are more attractive to tenants, which can help to reduce void periods and increase rental values.

Real estate has a key role to play in the nature crisis. It can reduce its negative impact on nature, and it can have a positive impact and contribute to climate solutions. Nature also has the potential to enhance investment returns and to make buildings more attractive to owners, tenants and communities.

Author: Georgie Nelson, Head of ESG, Real Estate

Funds operated by this manager:

Source:

^1. United Nations Environment Programme (March 2022) Managing Transition Risk in Real Estate: Aligning to the Paris Climate Accord.
^2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human wellbeing. Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.

How to Handle a Correction

27 Mar 2024 - Marcus Today

It has been one year since the bottom of the market on March 23, 2020. Since then, the ASX 200 is up 65.5%... if you bought at the absolute low and sold a year later.

27 Mar 2024 - How to Handle a Correction

By: Marcus Today

How to Handle a Correction

Marcus Today

March 2024

It has been one year since the bottom of the market on March 23, 2020. Since then, the ASX 200 is up 65.5%... if you bought at the absolute low and sold a year later.

ASX 200

For any fund manager getting abused for not achieving 54.44% in the post-pandemic recovery year, you might point out to your complaining client that the 54.44% was from the lowest low, which existed for a micro-instant on March 23rd 2020 in the most volatile week in decades. That week the market had a range of 18.9%.

To have achieved 54%, you would have needed not just the the presence of mind (balls) to buy the market at that micro instant low, but you would have had to have done it amidst unprecedented volatility, and you would have had to go in 100% (no cash). And you only had an instant to do it. If you had waited a week and had caught the top in that second week, then the market has only gone up 26.7% in the last 51 weeks, not 54.44%. Half the 51.59%.

Basically, if you missed the bottom of the market by a week and if you had inched in, or pyramided in, not gone all in, you would have lost even more of the gains. There is no one that went in 100% at the bottom.

So just in case you get trolled about your performance, you can ask your investor if they really expected you to go all-in at exactly the right micro-instant.

Truth is, the convenience of hindsight makes it very easy to complain about fund manager performance, and charts extremes are the most fabulous data points for those complaints.

15 Golden Rules From The Pandemic

Here are some of the lessons from the last year. Observations about sharp market corrections and their recovery.

Some of the best bits of the market are the exponential bits ahead of a correction. You have to participate in those exuberant moments or you'll never get the averages, not be too fearful or cautious. Enjoy the exuberant bits. Play the game when it is "on". Laugh all the way to the top. Let the finger-waggers wag, they always do when people make a fortune with little effort.
Corrections are inevitable and regular. Expect a big one every ten years (50%), and a tradeable one every three years (10-20%).
Corrections come quickly. You don't have much time to react. You have to be decisive.
Recoveries come slowly. It's a year from the correction and what we lost in 23 trading days we still haven't recovered. You have plenty of time in the recovery, plenty of time to decide when and what to buy. There's no rush. You never have to catch the knife. The market never crashes up. You do not have to catch the bottom.
If you ever say "I can't buy it, it's gone up 10% in a week" you will fail at investment. If you are the sort of investor who says "It's up 100%, I've missed it", you doom yourself to conservatism. Chickens don't make money. You will never buy a ten-bagger. Forget APT up 780% in a year. Eleven stocks in the All Ordinaries have been ten baggers (up over 1,000%) in the last year. 180 stocks (36% of the All Ordinaries index) have doubled, and 290 (58%) are up more than 50%. Percentages are big in a correction and a recovery. Do not be scared of big percentages. You can buy stocks that have gone up, but in a recovery, you have to buy stocks that have gone up.
No one knows when corrections are coming and those that did, didn't know for sure, they just made a fuss when they discovered (in hindsight) that they made the right noises at the right time.
Do not think you will be so clever as to predict the end before it happens. You can't predict the big sell-offs, just be aware (as now) when some of the ingredients are in place (money printing, excessive debt, rising rates, overvaluation) but don't do anything about the signs of a market correction until the correction begins. We are in the reaction game, not the prediction game. Yes, become more sensitive to the signs the more stupid it gets, but still... wait. And when the precipitous signals turn into a precipitous market, you'll be ready to be decisive.
Corrections are great! They are to be welcomed as an opportunity. Do not fear them, welcome them. Best moments in the market, but not if you pull out, stay out, or deny it's happening.
No one will ever tell you to sell. No one in the industry wants you in cash. They want you in their fund, in their product; trading, speculating, active. To go to cash through a professional will require you to be assertive. To go to cash as an individual seems like a big decision, but really, it's not.
Cash is always king. There is nothing wrong with cash, ever. Even if you get the timing terribly wrong all you miss is "not making money". You can wear that whilst you think. Being in cash is riskless. You have all the power. You can buy tomorrow. Do not be fearful of going to cash. It's no biggie. It's actually very cathartic, especially when things get wild.
Catching the bottom of a correction is all about sentiment. When everyone has lost faith in/sight of fundamentals, you need skills reading the herd, not the numbers. Watch the herd, don't join the herd. Look at the tables above, at the best recovery stocks and their PEs and Yields. Warren Buffett could not have picked those stocks on the numbers. Most of the best stocks combined zero yields and were loss-making. Read the herd, not the numbers. Fundamentals are useless when it comes to timing the market. It's why value investors always emphasise the long term, because they are useless in the short term. "It's a weighing machine, not a voting machine" is just an excuse for giving up on timing the market.
At extreme moments the market drives all, sinks all boats, lifts all boats. Focus all your attention on identifying the "Pivot Point" in the market. In corrections the woods are on the move, forget the trees until the forest is going up again.
Stock selection comes second to the market. After the market pivot point, stock selection is about where you will make the most money, but you have to get the market right first. If you get that right you'll make money in everything.
The recovery will come fastest and hardest in the stocks that have suffered the most extreme sentiment swings. In the last year Qantas, Stockland, EDP Education and Virgin were not the stocks with the best fundamentals (far from it), they were stocks that got the most oversold, so rebounded the most. The money is in identifying and timing the extremes of sentiment in stocks as well.
Don't bother to buy defensive stocks when the correction starts. Do you remember A2M, FPH, TLS and WOW performing better than the rest of the market when the market fell over? They had a "moment" of outperformance. But in the recovery, they have been some of the worst performers. Defensive stocks will not serve you well at any time. Leave them to the fund managers who concern themselves with their own relative, not actual, performance. For an individual investor, there is almost no point at which you would want to buy a "defensive" stock. They make less money in the recovery and there is no point holding the stock that loses you less money in a correction.

At the end of the day, the pandemic year has been great for us as investors. It has been a year of fabulous opportunities. Hopefully you played the game. Look forward to the next great correction. Hopefully we'll all have the vigilance, experience and courage to exploit it, not run from it.

Author: Marcus Padley

Funds operated by this manager:

Marcus Today Equity Income SMA, Marcus Today Growth SMA

Australian Secure Capital Fund - Market Update

26 Mar 2024 - Australian Secure Capital Fund

The first weekend of March saw 2019 auctions take place across the combined capital cities, down slightly on the previous year's 2,054, however clearance rates were up, 71.8% in comparison to 66.3% in 2023.

26 Mar 2024 - Australian Secure Capital Fund - Market Update

By: Australian Secure Capital Fund

Australian Secure Capital Fund - Market Update

Australian Secure Capital Fund

March 2024

The first weekend of March saw 2,019 auctions take place across the combined capital cities, down slightly on the previous year's 2,054, however clearance rates were up, 71.8% in comparison to 66.3% in 2023. Melbourne once again led the way, with 1,038 auctions taking place, followed by Sydney with 721, well above that of the other capitals, with Brisbane, Adelaide, Canberra and Perth recording 103, 85, 69 and 3 auctions respectively.

The preliminary clearance rate of 71.8% for the weekend indicates that buyers and sellers are on the same page for the most part, particularly in Sydney where a clearance rate of 76.8% was achieved, well above the 68.7% of the same weekend last year.

Melbourne, Adelaide, Brisbane and Canberra all managed to achieve clearance rates of above 60% for the weekend, with 70.1%, 69.4%, 65.0% and 63.8% respectively. It is interesting to note that all capital cities achieved a greater clearance rate than the same weekend in 2023, other than Adelaide, where a 72.9% clearance rate was achieved on the same weekend last year.

February brought yet another strong month for property prices, with CoreLogic's Home Value Index showing a 0.6% increase across the combined capitals and combined regionals, with all capital cities experiencing growth except for Hobart, where prices fell by 0.3% for the month.

Once again, Perth experienced the greatest level of growth, increasing by a mammoth 1.8% for the month, contributing to a 5.2% quarterly growth and an increase of 18.3% annually. Adelaide also experienced strong monthly growth of 1.1%, followed by Brisbane with a further 0.9% increase, bringing the median property value of Brisbane above $800,000 for the first time, with a median value of $805,593, the second highest median value nationally, behind only Sydney with $1,128,155. Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne also experienced growth for the month of 0.7%, 0.5% and 0.1% respectively, with all cities except for Hobart (-0.6%) and Darwin (-0.1%) experiencing an annual increase.

Whilst there was no RBA meeting this month, economists continue to believe we are at the end of the rate hike cycle, with many expecting interest rate reductions before the end of 2024. Should interest rates ease, we expect that there will be a bump in property prices.

Clearance Rates & Auctions week of 4^th of March 2024

Property Values as at 1^st of March 2024

Median Dwelling Values as at 1^st of March 2024

Quick Insights

Values to Outperform

Two-fifths of valuers surveyed by CBRE have predicted house prices to outperform by up to 10% in Adelaide, Perth, and Sydney. Valuers were also relatively bullish on the apartment sector with 44 per cent predicting prices to increase over the next 12 months. The survey also highlighted a high level of demand from upgraders and downsizers, buyer segments who were less sensitive to interest rate movements.

Source: Australian Financial Review

Build-to-Rent Builds Steam

Salta Properties, is now surging into the build-to-rent sector, with ambitions to create a $3 billion platform and with its first project in inner-city Melbourne close to completion.

"We could see that we were heading into a fairly significant housing shortage in Melbourne, and more broadly across Australia," said Sam Tarascio, manager of the firm. The first block is a 94-unit project in trendy Fitzroy North at 249 Queens Parade.

To be known as Fitzroy & Co, the building has topped out and is on track to welcome first residents from July into their one, two and three-bedroom apartments. Those tenants can expect a range of resident services, access to shared spaces and a variety of amenities.

Source: Australian Financial Review

Author: Filippo Sciacca, Director - Investor Relations, Asset Management and Compliance

Funds operated by this manager:

ASCF High Yield Fund, ASCF Premium Capital Fund, ASCF Select Income Fund

New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

25 Mar 2024 - FundMonitors.com

Here are some of the latest additions to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research,...

25 Mar 2024 - New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

By: FundMonitors.com

New Funds on FundMonitors.com

Below are some of the funds we've recently added to our database. Follow the links to view each fund's profile, where you'll have access to their offer documents, monthly reports, historical returns, performance analytics, rankings, research, platform availability, and news & insights.

Perpetual Smaller Companies Fund

Inception date:	October 1996	Minimum initial investment:	AU$25,000
Strategy:	Equity Long	Distributions:	6 Monthly
Geographic mandate:	Australia	Management fee:	1.25%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

Perpetual Strategic Capital Fund - Class A

Inception date:	November 2023	Minimum initial investment:	AU$25,000
Strategy:	Equity Long	Distributions:	6 Monthly
Geographic mandate:	Australia/Global	Management fee:	0.90%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	25.00%

View Profile

Altius Sustainable Bond Fund

Inception date:	November 2014	Minimum initial investment:	AU$5,000
Strategy:	Fixed Income	Distributions:	Quarterly
Geographic mandate:	Australia/Global	Management fee:	0.37%
Investor type:	Retail	Performance fee:	Nil

View Profile

GCQ Flagship Fund (Class P)

Inception date:	July 2022	Minimum initial investment:	AU$50,000
Strategy:	Equity Long/Short	Distributions:	6 Monthly
Geographic mandate:	Global	Management fee:	1.25%
Investor type:	Wholesale & Retail	Performance fee:	15.00%

View Profile

Want to see more funds?

Subscribe for full access to these funds and over 800 others

Future Quality Insights: Navigating the AI arms race

22 Mar 2024 - Yarra Capital Management

As investment managers, one of the most important - but also one of the hardest - things to do is knowing when to admit you've made a mistake. And errors of judgment can happen frequently in investment - in-depth research, strictly applied...

22 Mar 2024 - Future Quality Insights: Navigating the AI arms race

By: Yarra Capital Management

Future Quality Insights: Navigating the AI arms race

Yarra Capital Management

February 2024

As investment managers, one of the most important - but also one of the hardest - things to do is knowing when to admit you've made a mistake. And errors of judgment can happen frequently in investment - in-depth research, strictly applied investment philosophies and disciplined portfolio execution are all critical tools that can help minimise risk and create robust investment portfolios capable of generating strong long-term returns, but they can't predict the future.

So, recognising the need to revisit an investment thesis, or when to reverse a trade entirely, is a lesson all investment managers need to learn. For us, that time came midway through last year.

AI: a technology game changer

We started 2023 being wary of the technology sector. Many firms within the sector had benefited from the prior cycle of cheap money, leading us to have concerns that such firms would suffer in a tighter spending environment compounded by higher capital costs.

What we hadn't anticipated was the rapid emergence of a new form of technology that would structurally change the prospects not only for the tech sector itself, but could also have much wider economic and social implications.

AI is not new a technology. In fact, its history can be traced back to the 1950s. But what changed on 30 November 2022, with the launch of ChatGPT, was the emergence of usable generative AI and machine-learning tools that have the potential to completely transform the business world in the decades ahead.

Suddenly, the future pathway for the technology sector shifted dramatically. AI will likely define a new era of technology adoption, making it a secular driver of growth that is independent of broader economic trends. Businesses and governments will need to invest in AI or risk being left behind. AI has become the new arms race.

Applying a Future Quality lens to AI

Having discerned that there's more to AI than hype, we conducted rational and focused research to ascertain the extent to which AI overlaps with the principles of our Future Quality philosophy. Not only did we conclude that AI is a tangible, long-term trend, but we were also able to identify a host of reasons for why capital expenditure on AI should grow rapidly.

The cost of undertaking machine learning and AI is massive; leading-edge computers are required to handle these models and datacentres will need to be scaled up. The tech titans are leading this AI spending, dipping into their deep pockets as they perceive AI as a way to deepen the moats around their franchises. Similarly, governments are also allocating funds to capture the military capabilities of AI and its utilisation in modern warfare.

This deep dive into AI clearly established that the sector would benefit from a very real and tangible tailwind that would likely endure for the next decade or longer. While our bottom-up, stock-picking investment approach centres around finding Future Quality companies - those which are able to grow, attain and sustain superior returns on invested capital and have key quality pillars in place (Franchise, Management, Balance Sheet and Valuation) - we are not averse to harnessing long-term structural themes that will help drive that growth.

AI undoubtedly represents one such driver, but we also track several other so-called 'mega themes' in order to identify other investment prospects and ensure our portfolio benefits from a diversified set of independent growth drivers. At present, we see long-term alpha opportunities from enablers of the energy transition; the normalisation and structural growth in global travel following pandemic-imposed restrictions; and among the providers of more efficient healthcare at a time when the world's population is ageing rapidly and there is a great need to reduce the cost of health services worldwide.

A Future Quality case study: Nvidia

Once a trend has been robustly ascertained, the next step is to look at the set of players to identify who will be the likely winners and losers. To do this, we looked back at previous waves of technology adoption - there have already been several over the last few decades - and found that leading hardware providers have dominated. They have had first mover advantage and have taken the lion's share of profitability. In the mainframe era, the winner was IBM. In terms of PC adoption it was Intel, and for smartphones it has undoubtedly been Apple.

So, when we looked at hardware spend on AI, we found that one name currently leads the pack: Nvidia.

Nvidia ticks all the boxes of our Future Quality thesis. It has long-term leadership in the provision of the GPU/DPU technology needed for leading-edge AI, making it the partner of choice for many key technology customers (Franchise). It has stable management and scores highly in terms of both corporate governance and human capital development (Management). Its balance sheet is strong, with net cash, high free cash flow returns and further share buybacks are expected (Balance Sheet). As one of the magnificent seven stocks that led the stock market advance last year, its share price may have already appreciated significantly, but we forecast an enduring period of high growth (Valuation).

Chart 1: Nvidia cash return on equity (%), 2023 - 2027

Source: Nikko AM forecast, as of August 2023.

Having affirmed Nvidia's Future Quality credentials, we purchased the stock in August 2023. As the dominant semiconductor provider, we believe Nvidia will maintain its growth trajectory amid an acceleration in the market for AI-compatible chips, as well as its additional software services. In short, we see this as a US$1trillion opportunity.

Chart 2: The opportunity for Nvidia

Source: Nvidia, August, 2023.

How AI helped re-focus a business: Meta

We also considered how AI is being applied by other technology businesses.

While Meta - the owner of Facebook and Instagram - was always on our watchlist, we no longer held the stock within our portfolio as we felt its heavy investment in developing the metaverse represented a poor return on capital and perceived that the business had taken its eye off the real revenue driver of its business model of selling advertising to large and small businesses around the world.

Fortunately, Meta's management recognised the error of its ways, redeploying capital into AI and using AI to reinforce its core franchise. This is already delivering a notable impact; people are spending more time on its platforms and Meta has already seen its share of global advertising revenue go up - a particularly notable feat during a time when the advertising cycle is under strain from a more depressed economic environment.

This change in business strategy has resulted in a notable improvement in Meta's returns on capital and better growth prospects. We now believe that Meta once again meets our Future Quality criteria, as its outlook now aligns with our expectations of sustained and superior returns, and as a result we have reintroduced the stock back into our portfolio.

Identifying the leaders of the AI revolution

Investing isn't an exact science. Trying to pick winning businesses over a 5-10 year horizon is not an easy task and errors will inevitably be made, especially when new trends emerge. However, for seasoned investors, the ability to acknowledge such mistakes and take appropriate action is the key to long-term, successful investing. For us, that means re-evaluating an investment thesis based on our Future Quality criteria. Our research shows that AI is a new paradigm that will have significant investment implications for the future and shouldn't be ignored or avoided. However, as with every nascent development, the successful adopters of AI and the ultimate winners are not yet evident, so we will proceed with caution rather than run with the herd. Our focus remains on finding Future Quality businesses with a visible pathway to future growth, regardless of whether they are AI-aligned, affiliated with another megatrend or have their own robust idiosyncratic business case, but all are connected by our Future Quality investment philosophy.

Funds operated by this manager:

Yarra Australian Equities Fund, Yarra Emerging Leaders Fund, Yarra Enhanced Income Fund, Yarra Income Plus Fund

ESG in 10: Episode 15 - The disproportionate impact of modern slavery on women...

21 Mar 2024 - Fidante Partners

In this episode, we delve deep into this crucial topic with Melissa Stewart, a member of the Alphinity Sustainable Share Fund and Alphinity Global Sustainable Equity Fund (Managed Fund) compliance committees.

Search for:
Fund:	Type a few letters to search
Manager:
Publish Dates:	From: To:

Fund Monitors Pty Ltd

News

NEWS

5 Apr 2024 - Assessing the impact of green bonds

Which metrics matter most to green bond investors?

Engagement throughout the lifecycle

Regulatory challenges

What next for green bond fund impact reporting?

4 Apr 2024 - When Private Equity Would Be Laughed Out of The Boardroom

3 Apr 2024 - 10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes

1. Confirmation bias

2. Information bias

3. Loss aversion/endowment effect

4. Incentive-caused bias

5. Oversimplification tendency

6. Hindsight bias

7. Bandwagon effect (or herd mentality)

8. Restraint bias

9. Neglect of probability

10. Anchoring bias

2 Apr 2024 - New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

28 Mar 2024 - Planting the seed of change: real estate's role in the nature crisis

A focus on nature

How does real estate affect nature?

Five drivers of nature loss

Green infrastructure creates a positive impact

Types of green infrastructure [2]

How does nature benefit real estate investment performance?

27 Mar 2024 - How to Handle a Correction

15 Golden Rules From The Pandemic

26 Mar 2024 - Australian Secure Capital Fund - Market Update

Clearance Rates & Auctions week of 4th of March 2024

Property Values as at 1st of March 2024

Median Dwelling Values as at 1st of March 2024

Quick Insights

Values to Outperform

Build-to-Rent Builds Steam

25 Mar 2024 - New Funds on Fundmonitors.com

22 Mar 2024 - Future Quality Insights: Navigating the AI arms race

Source: Nikko AM forecast, as of August 2023.

Source: Nvidia, August, 2023.

21 Mar 2024 - ESG in 10: Episode 15 - The disproportionate impact of modern slavery on women and girls

Category

Search

Events Calendar

Clearance Rates & Auctions week of 4^th of March 2024

Property Values as at 1^st of March 2024

Median Dwelling Values as at 1^st of March 2024