NEWS
23 Mar 2022 - Pet Humanisation Megatrend
Pet Humanisation Megatrend Insync Fund Managers March 2022 Since 1988, The APPA National Pet Owners Survey has delivered comprehensive consumer research studies about pet ownership, pet care practices and preferences in product and services consumption of America's pet owners. Below are some of the highlights that are particularly noteworthy - Pet ownership is up
Spending increased
Millennials are the largest 'pet parents'
Spending is up post pandemic, as 'pet parents' are more than ever before willing to sacrifice more of their paycheques to provide premium care and services for their pets. The $100 Bn pet industry is poised to nearly triple to $275 billion by 2030 (Morgan Stanley). An annual compound rate in excess of 14% p.a. growth. The American Pet Products Association is a not-for-profit industry association founded in 1958 and is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut. The APPA represents more than 1000 pet product manufacturers, importers of pet products and suppliers of products for non-pet livestock as well. Funds operated by this manager: Insync Global Capital Aware Fund, Insync Global Quality Equity Fund |
23 Mar 2022 - How Alphabet is using AI to power its future business success
How Alphabet is using AI to power its future business success Montaka Global Investments March 2022 Most investors suspect that AI sits at the core of Alphabet's key businesses (Search, YouTube, Cloud, etc). But many are still underestimating how AI is creating unimaginable opportunities in completely new industries for the technology giant. Like Microsoft and its cloud computing division Azure, Alphabet's AI capabilities appear to be following a similar path of explosive growth after years of incubation. Below we look at 4 ways that Alphabet is using AI to significantly enhance its businesses, respond to competitive threats, and also generate solutions to some of the world's most pressing problems (such as renewable energy) that we couldn't imagine solving just a few years ago. We expect these 4 examples - and AI more broadly - to make Alphabet even more mission-critical to customers, open immensely larger markets for the company, and drive increased profitability for many years to come - all of which will continue to underpin Alphabet's role as a core holding in Montaka's investment portfolios. 1. Google Search - Like a duck ...Alphabet is obviously best known for the ubiquitous Google Search engine that has maintained its competitive advantage for over two-decades and holds over 90% global market share. This is a frightening feat in an industry that innovates as quickly as technology. Unsurprisingly, the incredible moat that surrounds Search has its foundation drenched in Alphabet's most cutting-edge AI research and development. In many ways Google Search is like a duck, the query box has not changed for over twenty years, but while it might look calm on the surface, it is paddling like crazy underneath!
For example, at the end of 2019 Google Search incorporated BERT, a neural network-based AI technique for natural language processing, which was hailed by Alphabet as the "the biggest advancement made to Search in the last five years". Just two years later (2021), Alphabet introduced MUM, a next-generation AI and a step-change enhancement to existing capabilities noting; "MUM is a big advancement in Search, 1,000 times more powerful than our current systems. It has the ability to learn and transfer knowledge across 75 languages". Incredibly, the speed at which these mind-blowing AI breakthroughs are being melded into Google Search is accelerating. And just this year (Feb 2022), Sundar Pichai (CEO) revealed on Alphabet's Q4 2021 earnings call, that Search was now running a new AI architecture called Pathways. He highlighted that "AI models are typically trained to do only one thing, but with Pathways, a single model can be trained to do thousands, even millions of things". This is expected to represent a major enhancement to Search quality and add further monetization options to the business. 2. YouTube - AI helps Alphabet clean up contentAI is also driving enormous efficiencies at YouTube. Alphabet's YouTube is the largest online video platform in the world, with over two billion monthly active users who watch more than one billion hours of content per day and upload 500 hours of new content per minute! Operating a network of this scale is a herculean engineering feat, but more impressive is how Alphabet is applying artificial intelligence to make the platform safer and more trusted for consumers and advertisers. At the scale YouTube operates, it is physically impossible for humans to moderate every piece of content that is uploaded. This is a huge problem given the size of YouTube's userbase and their voracious appetite for video content. Explicit and inappropriate content can have a significant impact on children, promote violence, spread disinformation, and alienate advertisers. It is no secret that many online platforms struggle with the problem of content moderation which will remain a perpetual challenge. However, Alphabet has made incredible progress using its cutting-edge artificial intelligence. Utilizing AI and promoting trusted sources across YouTube has resulted in a mind-blowing 85% reduction in content that violates YouTube's policies. Alphabet's AI decimated inappropriate content on YouTube
Source: Alphabet, Montaka Alphabet can now detect nearly 95% of all violative content on YouTube with automated AI flagging and address it before it becomes a problem. These results were driven by the application of scalable, automated AI technologies which will likely continue driving margins higher across YouTube as the need for expensive, manual human moderation of content fades. The high-grading of content on YouTube also makes advertisers more confident that their brands and products are promoted in an appropriate fashion, drawing more advertising dollars to the platform and incentivizing creators to produce more content (flywheel). 3. AI is accelerating Alphabet's ability to counter new competitionAI is also helping Alphabet to quickly adapt to competitive threats. Early in the pandemic Alphabet identified TikTok and its highly addictive, AI-enabled recommendation engine as a competitive threat. TikTok's engagement numbers were growing extraordinarily quickly as consumers demanded short-form, vertical videos during lock-down and were flocking to the platform. The speed with which Alphabet was able to create YouTube Shorts and address this video content gap in its ecosystem, highlights Alphabet's incredible leadership across AI and how it can be applied to support and enhance its core business. YouTube Shorts was created as a concept in the depths of the pandemic and has now grown to over 15 billion global daily video views inside of 18 months. This is a startling demonstration of exponential growth, YouTube's ecosystem, and the power of Alphabet's AI. Alphabet's AI enabled the creation of YouTube Shorts
Source: Alphabet, Montaka While TikTok does not disclose global daily views, it is believed to have 4 to 5 billion in the U.S. alone and many more globally. It is a serious competitor that may have impacted the business more dramatically if not for Alphabet's extraordinary AI capabilities that enabled YouTube Shorts to be so successful.Source: Alphabet, Montaka. Interestingly, YouTube Shorts has largely been focused on engagement, user experience and product market fit, rather than monetization. Alphabet has significant runway ahead with respect to this incremental revenue stream with CEO Sundar Pichai noting "there's a lot more to do, [it's] super early...[we are] testing how shopping can be integrated with Shorts...the opportunity space here is pretty broad and it's exciting". 4. AI is helping Alphabet to solve the unsolvableAI is also helping Alphabet address some of the world's most intractable problems, including sources of renewable energy. The ocean potentially contains an unlimited source of carbon free and costless energy, if only we had the technology to unlock it. If we could find a solution to nuclear fusion, we could turn a single glass of seawater into a full year of power for an entire household. It would produce virtually no emissions and be available on-demand ... but it has long been science fiction. That is until DeepMind, Alphabet's cutting-edge AI division took on the problem. Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the sun and all the stars in the universe. It involves smashing hydrogen atoms together (fusion), rather than splitting uranium atoms (fission) and releases quadruple the amount of energy of a typical nuclear fission reaction. Nuclear fusion produces four times the yield of nuclear fission
Source: HyperPhysics A major challenge of nuclear fusion is the temperature required to perform it. Given the enormous gravitational pressure at the core of the sun, nuclear fusion can be achieved at around 10 million degrees Celsius. However, this level of pressure is not possible on earth. In fact, we need an environment that is 10 times hotter than the core of the sun for nuclear fusion. There is no material that can withstand such high temperatures, so fusion needs to be achieved in a plasma (super-heated gas) and held inside a continually changing magnetic field to control the reaction, something that is incredibly difficult to do. A further constraint around nuclear fusion research has been the ability to run experiments. To create a fusion reaction, scientists use a machine called a 'tokamak' to simulate sun-like conditions on earth. However, after three seconds of activity the tokomak needs 15 minutes to cool down. Software-based plasma simulators are even slower and require several hours of compute time to simulate just one second of real-time data. This is a highly inefficient way to carry out research, effectively rendering nuclear fusion a pipedream given our inability to address the problem. Enter Alphabet's DeepMind, in what has been hailed a major breakthrough and published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature, constructed an algorithm built on AI reinforcement learning to control the magnetic fields that govern plasma in a fusion reaction. DeepMind's algorithm predicted it would be able to control a real-life reaction for two seconds which was then applied to a real-life tokamak. The AI was spot-on. It controlled the plasma reaction exactly as predicted in the real-world. Over-time it is hoped Alphabet's AI will produce algorithms that enable plasma reactions to go on far longer than two seconds, and move humanity a step closer to solving the eternal problem of nuclear fusion. If successful, Alphabet's nuclear fusion AI would likely be sold as-a-service to customers looking to produce energy from this source. Potentially unleashing an explosive new revenue stream for Alphabet in the future. Inside a Tokamak Fusion Reactor (Illustrative)
Source: Financial Times A TECHNOLOGICAL INFLECTIONArtificial Intelligence is enhancing all areas of Alphabet's business, from those with valuable monetization models including Search, YouTube and Cloud, to emerging opportunities like autonomous driving (Waymo). Increasingly however, AI is creating opportunities in unexpected areas that Alphabet has not historically participated, raising the potential for it to disrupt entirely new industries and create brand new revenue streams in areas such as energy, biotechnology and beyond (i.e. real-options). Investors overlook and take for granted that silently sitting beneath the surface of Alphabet is perhaps the most cutting-edge AI apparatus the world has ever seen. It represents an insurmountable competitive advantage that will continue to strengthen for decades to come and propel the business forward in unimaginable ways. For readers interested in exploring AI from a broader and more general perspective, we cover many of our key insights in our AI Whitepaper which readers can access here. We believe that the months and years ahead will present opportunities to make attractive, multi-generational investments and we are prepared and well-positioned to take advantage of these. Note: Montaka owns shares in Alphabet (Google) Author: Amit Nath, Senior Research Analyst Funds operated by this manager: Montaka Global Fund, Montaka Global Long Only Fund DISCLAIMER |
22 Mar 2022 - Fund Review: Bennelong Long Short Equity Fund February 2022
BENNELONG LONG SHORT EQUITY FUND
Attached is our most recently updated Fund Review on the Bennelong Long Short Equity Fund.
- The Fund is a research driven, market and sector neutral, "pairs" trading strategy investing primarily in large-caps from the ASX/S&P100 Index, with over 20-years' track record and an annualised return of 13.11%.
- The consistent returns across the investment history highlight the Fund's ability to provide positive returns in volatile and negative markets and significantly outperform the broader market. The Fund's Sharpe Ratio and Sortino Ratio are 0.76 and 1.14 respectively.
For further details on the Fund, please do not hesitate to contact us.
22 Mar 2022 - Supply chains, logistics and inflation
Supply chains, logistics and inflation Forager Funds Management 07 March 2021 In this video, Steve Johnson and Chloe Stokes discuss a topic that's been top of mind for many investors: cost inflation and what it might mean for the future. The impacts have been pretty widespread so far, Steve says. For example, supply shortages have resulted in product mark-ups from the likes of Installed Building Products (NYSE:IBP), while online beauty retailer Adore Beauty's (ASX:ABY) customer acquisition costs have increased significantly as competition for its customers increases, and fast-fashion retailer Boohoo's (LON:BOO) margins have taken a hit due to significant increases in freight costs. |
Funds operated by this manager: Forager Australian Shares Fund (ASX: FOR), Forager International Shares Fund |
22 Mar 2022 - War. What is it good for?
War. What is it good for? Montgomery Investment Management March 2022 Edwin Starr's classic 1969 anti-war song, War, asks: "War: What is it good for?" and responds emphatically "absolutely nothing." It's hard to argue with the sentiment. But it turns out Starr was not completely correct. You see, despite the terrifying carnage and destruction, war can often be a fruitful time to invest. Let me be clear: I detest armed conflict. War should be avoided at all times and not prompted by immature despots, seeking acclaim they can only take to their grave. With Russia and the Ukraine on the brink of war, and with markets predictably reacting negatively, I thought it is worth revisiting the enquiries I made the last time an armed conflict threatened to destabilise the world and markets. History suggests past conflicts have not inflicted permanent pain on investors. It has indeed been wise, historically, to invest at the depths of the conflict when fear was at its extreme. Research by LPL Financial, conducted in 2020, of market reactions to past geopolitical crises confirms stock market investors have mostly shrugged off geopolitical conflicts as some sectors and companies have continued to generate profits. Of course, that latter observation doesn't let investors off the hook because stocks can, and frequently do, move independently of the performance of the underlying business. Table 1, from 2020 by LPL Financial reveals however investors would be wise not to sell into the fear and weakness but instead, remember that there have been dozens, if not hundreds, of conflicts in the past and the stock market has survived. This of course is not to diminish the very real suffering at the hands of tyrants and dictators, which democratic allies should pull all stops to prevent. Table 1. A summary of geopolitical events and stock market reactions
Source: LPL Research, S&P Dow Jones Index, CFRA. 1/6/20 Let's put the current invasion of Eastern Ukraine by Russia into some perspective. Following the outbreak of World War I in 1914, the Dow Jones declined almost a third within six months. Business ground to a halt and liquidity in the stock market vaporised as foreign investors sold US stocks to raise money for the war effort. The NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) closed on July 31, 1914. The world's financial markets closed their doors by August 1. The NYSE was closed for four months. It was the longest suspension of trading, and circuit breaker, in history. Almost immediately, however, a substitute trading forum called the New Street market emerged and trading began offering economically meaningful liquidity but impaired price transparency. Closing the stock exchange for a third of a year would be unthinkable today. It was unthinkable then. To wit: "If at any time up to July, 1914, any Wall Street man had asserted that the stock exchange could be kept closed continually for four and one-half months he would have been laughed to scorn."[1] It must have seemed grim for stock market investors, especially for anyone with capital tied up and locked down. After the stock market reopened in 1915, however, the Dow Jones rose more than 88 per cent. 1915 recorded the highest annual return on record for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. From the start of World War I in 1914, until its end in 1918, the Dow Jones rose 43 per cent or about 8.7 per cent annually. The Second World War must have seemed primed to be a whole lot worse. From the start of WWII in September 1939, when Hitler invaded Poland, until it ended in late 1945, the Dow Jones rose 50 per cent - equivalent to a compounded seven per cent per annum. In other words, the two most damaging conflicts in history saw the stock market rise meaningfully. On 7 December 1941, when the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Honolulu, by surprise, stocks opened the following Monday down 2.9 per cent, but it took just a month to regain those losses. And then, when the allied forces invaded France on D-Day on June 6, 1944, the Dow Jones barely reacted and rose more than five per cent over the subsequent month. Caveat(s) According to research conducted in 2015, into U.S. military conflicts after World War II by the Swiss Finance Institute, stock prices tend to decline in the pre-war phase and recover when war commences. But when war is a complete surprise, stocks decline. Another study, published in 2013 by Mark Armbruster, of Armbruster Capital Management, examined the period from 1926 through July 2013 and found that stock market volatility was actually lower during periods of war. "We looked at returns and volatility leading up to and during World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Gulf War. We opted to exclude the Iraq War from this group, as the Iraq War included a major economic boom, and subsequent bust, that had very little do with the nation's involvement in a war. "As the table below [Table 2.] shows, war does not necessarily imply lackluster returns for Domestic stocks. Quite the contrary, stocks have outperformed their long-term averages during wars. On the other hand, bonds, usually a safe harbor during tumultuous times, have performed below their historic averages during periods of war." Table 2. Capital market performance at times of war
Source: Mark Armbruster/CFA Institute In recent years, the 9/11 attacks and the Global Financial Crisis in particular, have trained investors to expect central banks to rescue them through the repression of financial market volatility. Moreover, the belief and hope the initial conflict doesn't escalate, drawing in the rest of the world, has also been supported by real world experience. Investors have thus been conditioned to eschew an overreaction. It is probably the fear of an all-inclusive war that inspires investor reaction to even the most minor of conflicts involving powerful nations but investors do well more often than not, when they remain invested, take advantage of weak prices and correctly bet that sober hearts and minds will prevail. Most of the time it is economic and idiosyncratic fundamental factors that impact security prices. Very rarely, a solitary exogenous event is influential enough to override the usual factors and impact market returns materially. Based on research of history and the above data, however, war and geopolitical conflicts shouldn't be counted in that category. Author: Roger Montgomery, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer Funds operated by this manager: Montgomery (Private) Fund, Montgomery Small Companies Fund, The Montgomery Fund [1] Noble (1915, p. 87). |
21 Mar 2022 - Manager Insights | DS Capital
|
||
Chris Gosselin, CEO of Australian Fund Monitors, speaks with Rodney Brott, CEO & Executive Director of DS Capital. The DS Capital Growth Fund has a track record of 9 years and 2 months and has outperformed the ASX 200 Total Return Index since inception in January 2013, providing investors with an annualised return of 14.56% compared with the index's return of 9.07% over the same period.
|
21 Mar 2022 - Learning from historians as well as from history
Learning from historians as well as from history Equitable Investors 11 March 2022 Responding to cannon fire in the bay, the citizens of Melbourne armed themselves and gathered in Port Melbourne in September 1854, believing a Russian attack that media commentators had warned of was upon them. Twenty eight years later, Melbourne's Age newspaper warned that "it would be comparatively easy for Russia to bring down an overwhelming force from the neighborhood of the Amoor without awakening the suspicions of the British naval officers at China or Japan." The city's populace was then stirred by a series of articles claiming to have proof of a planned invasion - allegedly deciphered copies of telegrams between the Russian Minister of Marine and a Russian Admiral. But the cannon fire in 1854 was actually from a friendly ship, the Great Britain, that was celebrating its release from quarantine. And the telegrams of 1882 and stories of imminent invasion that surrounded them were a hoax. No invasion obviously ever eventuated. The Ballarat Courier described it as a "stupid and offensive affair". Melbournians (or a portion of them) had taken what they read in the newspapers at face value. They may have considered newspapers to be a trustworthy source. Gold had been discovered and wealth created that others might be envious of. There was a feeling of isolation given the distance from Great Britain. Russian ships had visited Victoria as they followed the winds on a "great circle" route to get from Europe to the northeastern region of their vast country. Information fragmentsThe tragic war that is being waged in Ukraine is generating volumes of information and disinformation around the clock. It is far easier now in the social media era than it was in the 1850s for investors to be exposed to incomplete fragments of the truth or deliberately misleading information that causes their imagination ro run away and make decisions hastily. This Ukraine war triggered panic when Russia attacked a Ukrainian nuclear power plant, Zaporizhzhia, which is understood to be the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. Images of heavy fire led to fears there would be a melt-down on a scale greater than Chernobyl. Not to underplay the potential risks of what is going on in Ukraine, the reality was in this case that it was a training building at the power plant that caught fire, not the nuclear reactors. And the experts tell us, with reference here to Bloomberg's reporting, that the reactors are "housed inside containment buildings that will protect them from plane crashes, tornadoes, bomb attacks, and explosions caused by the escape of flammable fission by-products". Learning from Historians as well as from History Students of history (the tales of Melbourne's Russian fears are sourced from this investor's long forgotten Honours Thesis in History) need to know how to research and dig for relevant information. But that is only half the battle. Historians must also be able to critically assess information. Who or what is the source? What was the intended audience? What motives and bias come into play? These skills are equally valuable to investors awash in live feeds from around the world - especially when a social media algorithm may be pushing one particular blinkered view or perspective on them. Author: Martin Pretty, Director Funds operated by this manager: |
18 Mar 2022 - Hedge Clippings |18 March 2022
|
|
Hedge Clippings | Friday, 18 March 2022 Overnight the US Federal Reserve finally bit the bullet and raised interest rates off rock bottom by 0.25% in what is almost certain to be the first step in many back to a normal monetary policy - assuming there is such a level as normal. The move was widely anticipated and in a classic case of "buy the rumour, sell the fact" - or in this case "sell the rumour, buy the fact," - both the Dow Jones and S&P500 jumped 1.23%, Nasdaq did a tad better, rising 1.33%, while the S&P500 VIX fell by 3.75%. News & Insights Manager Insights | DS Capital Investing in infrastructure: what's changed and where are the opportunities? | Magellan Asset Management Australian Equities - At The Crossroads? | Airlie Funds Management Learning from historians as well as from history | Equitable Investors |
|
February 2022 Performance News Glenmore Australian Equities Fund Insync Global Capital Aware Fund Equitable Investors Dragonfly Fund Paragon Australian Long Short Fund |
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday
|
18 Mar 2022 - Performance Report: Glenmore Australian Equities Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months (pa) | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | The main driver of identifying potential investments will be bottom up company analysis, however macro-economic conditions will be considered as part of the investment thesis for each stock. |
Manager Comments | The Glenmore Australian Equities Fund has a track record of 4 years and 9 months and therefore comparison over all market conditions and against its peers is limited. However, the fund has outperformed the ASX 200 Total Return Index since inception in June 2017, providing investors with an annualised return of 22.52% compared with the index's return of 8.6% over the same period. On a calendar year basis, the fund hasn't experienced any negative annual returns in the 4 years and 9 months since its inception. Over the past 12 months, the fund's largest drawdown was -8.65% vs the index's -6.35%, and since inception in June 2017 the fund's largest drawdown was -36.91% vs the index's maximum drawdown over the same period of -26.75%. The fund's maximum drawdown began in October 2019 and lasted 1 year and 1 month, reaching its lowest point during March 2020. The fund had completely recovered its losses by November 2020. The Manager has delivered these returns with 7.05% more volatility than the index, contributing to a Sharpe ratio which has fallen below 1 three times over the past four years and which currently sits at 1.02 since inception. The fund has provided positive monthly returns 90% of the time in rising markets and 39% of the time during periods of market decline, contributing to an up-capture ratio since inception of 222% and a down-capture ratio of 101%. |
More Information |
18 Mar 2022 - Performance Report: Insync Global Quality Equity Fund
Report Date | |
Manager | |
Fund Name | |
Strategy | |
Latest Return Date | |
Latest Return | |
Latest 6 Months | |
Latest 12 Months | |
Latest 24 Months (pa) | |
Annualised Since Inception | |
Inception Date | |
FUM (millions) | |
Fund Overview | Insync invests in a concentrated portfolio of high quality companies that possess long 'runways' of future growth benefitting from Megatrends. Megatrends are multiyear structural and disruptive changes that transform the way we live our daily lives and result from a convergence of different underlying trends including innovation, politics, demographics, social attitudes and lifestyles. They provide important tailwinds to individual stocks and sectors, that reside within them. Insync believe this delivers exponential earnings growth ahead of market expectations. Insync screens the universe of 40,000 listed global companies to just 150 that it views as superior. This includes profitability, balance sheet performance, shareholder focus and valuations. 20-40 companies are then chosen for the portfolio. These reflect the best outcomes from further analysis using a proprietary DCF valuation, implied growth modelling, and free cash flow yield; alongside management, competitor, and industry scrutiny. The Fund may hold some cash (maximum of 5%), derivatives, currency contracts for hedging purposes, and American and/or Global Depository Receipts. It is however, for all intents and purposes, a 'long-only' fund, remaining fully invested irrespective of market cycles. |
Manager Comments | The Insync Global Quality Equity Fund has a track record of 12 years and 5 months and has outperformed the Global Equity Index since inception in October 2009, providing investors with an annualised return of 13.15% compared with the index's return of 11.37% over the same period. On a calendar year basis, the fund has only experienced a negative annual return once in the 12 years and 5 months since its inception. Over the past 12 months, the fund's largest drawdown was -15.47% vs the index's -7.46%, and since inception in October 2009 the fund's largest drawdown was -15.47% vs the index's maximum drawdown over the same period of -13.59%. The fund's maximum drawdown began in January 2022 and has lasted 1 month, reaching its lowest point during February 2022. During this period, the index's maximum drawdown was -7.46%. The Manager has delivered these returns with 1.35% more volatility than the index, contributing to a Sharpe ratio which has fallen below 1 four times over the past five years and which currently sits at 0.94 since inception. The fund has provided positive monthly returns 82% of the time in rising markets and 21% of the time during periods of market decline, contributing to an up-capture ratio since inception of 83% and a down-capture ratio of 81%. |
More Information |