|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 05 December 2025 At the kind invitation of Conexus Financial, Hedge Clippings attended their Professional Planner Researcher Forum earlier this week. Held over two days in the Blue Mountains, apart from AFM, the event brought together a wide range of industry and sector participants (including research houses Lonsec, Morningstar, SQM, and Zenith), asset consultants, platform operators, advice groups, along with many others from the industry. Keynote speakers included ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland, industry luminary Graham Rich, and former gold medal-winning swimming legend Grant Hackett, now CEO of GDG, the listed owner of Lonsec and Evidentia. It's fair to say that the major and constantly recurring theme was the issue of conflict of interest (potential or real, depending on one's point of view) against the backdrop of the failure of Shield and First Guardian. However, rather than trying to cover the entire proceedings in Hedge Clippings, we have included selected links below to Professional Planners' own coverage of their event, and would recommend our readers explore further if interested. Commissioner Alan Kirkland, while defending the speed at which ASIC moved to shut down Shield and First Guardian, left no one in any doubt that they will not only be taking legal action against those they believe responsible, but will be following that up with new regulations, although non-specific on what those will be. One has to hope that it will be a practical and measured reaction, although we will have to wait and see in that regard. Insignia Financials' CEO Scott Hartley predicted a chaotic year ahead, thanks to Shield and First Guardian and the regulators' response. All present agreed this combination has potentially created a watershed moment for the research and advice sector, although depending on where one's loyalties, level of conflict of interest, or culpability lies, not everyone agreed on the solution, or in the case of conflict of interest, if they had one! Of interest was Morningstar's impending change to a "pay to play" model, just as ASIC is expected to increase scrutiny on the sector. Graham Rich summed up the issue of conflict nicely by reminding all present why some people rob banks ("it's simple, that's where the money is") while others were heard to comment "no conflict, no interest". We maintain the view that the "issuer pays" model is inherently conflicted and therefore open to potential abuse, even if not by the main participants, then by the bad actors in the distribution chain, including some, such as lead generators, that ASIC claims are outside the regulator's jurisdiction. For our part, we pointed out that while the consumer (advisors and platforms) might want a research report (even if they're not paying for it), the party paying, namely the fund manager, is more interested in the actual rating. Enough! Next week, the RBA meets for the last time this year, and we'll bring you our synopsis of the outcome, thanks to Renny Ellis and Nick Chaplin, from Arculus and Seed Funds Management, respectively. And for those more interested in trivia and comedy than conflicts of interest, today marks the 51st anniversary of the last Monty Python Flying Circus show back in 1974. In our opinion, it was, and remains one of the best, and most groundbreaking comedy series ever. News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com 10k Words | Equitable Investors Is travel becoming the new status symbol for Gen Z? | Insync Fund Managers October 2025 Performance News November 2025 Performance News Bennelong Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
